Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35357060›Full record

SynthesisDermatologic therapy2022

Dupilumab therapy in atopic dermatitis is safe during COVID-19 infection era: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 1611 patients.

Amr Ehab El-Qushayri, Mariam Abdelmageed Mahmoud, Samar Salman, Sameh Sarsik, Beatrice Nardone

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Dermatologic therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Reduced COVID-19 vaccine response in patient treated with dupilumab for IgG4-related disease.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Amr Ehab El-QushayriFaculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-0967-797X
Mariam Abdelmageed MahmoudFaculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Samar SalmanDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-8278-7684
Sameh SarsikDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-9068-9475
Beatrice NardoneDepartment of Dermatology, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1509-3791
Tanta University · EGMinia University · EGNorthwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the safety of dupilumab use in the management of atopic dermatitis (AD) during the current pandemic regarding the risk and the hazards of COVID-19 infection. Seven databases (Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scopus, Virtual Health Library, PubMed, System for Information on Gray Literature in Europe, and The New York Academy of Medicine) were searched for eligible studies from inception until November 24, 2021. The quality of evidence was rated using the National Institute of Health and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool. Meta-analysis was performed when the outcome is presented ≥2 studies. A total of 12 papers including 1611 AD patients were included in the study. The prevalence of COVID-19 in AD treated with dupilumab was 3.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-5.8). COVID-19 symptoms were reported by five patients who were presented with one or more of the following symptoms (fatigue, loss of taste and smell, runny nose, conjunctivitis, gastrointestinal symptoms, fever, cough, and dyspnea). Only three cases of COVID-19 were hospitalized with a prevalence of 4.5%, while no patients with COVID-19 died. Dupilumab is safe regarding the risk and the hazards of COVID-19 in AD patients. Thus, based on these results continuation of dupilumab in AD patients is recommended, since dupilumab seems to be safe and crucial for a better disease outcome.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentDermatitis, AtopicAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedHumansSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, Humanizeddupilumabatopic dermatitisCOVID-19dupilumabmeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID35357060
PMCPMC9111465
OpenAlexW4220749770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.