Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35357053›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2022

Deep learning derived automated ASPECTS on non-contrast CT scans of acute ischemic stroke patients.

Zehong Cao, Jiaona Xu, Bin Song, Lizhou Chen, Tianyang Sun, Yichu He, Ying Wei, Guozhong Niu, Yu Zhang, Qianjin Feng and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Brain Midline Approximation to Improve Symmetry Analysis of Brain CT Scans.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Extracellular traps and the role in thrombosis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Zehong CaoSchool of Biomedical Engineering Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiaona XuThe Fourth School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medicine University, Hangzhou, China.
Bin SongDepartment of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Lizhou ChenDepartment of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Tianyang SunDepartment of Research and Development, Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Yichu HeDepartment of Research and Development, Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Ying WeiDepartment of Research and Development, Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Guozhong NiuDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Yu ZhangSchool of Biomedical Engineering Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qianjin FengSchool of Biomedical Engineering Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhongxiang DingDepartment of Radiology, Key Laboratory of Clinical Cancer Pharmacology and Toxicology Research of Zhejiang Province, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Feng ShiDepartment of Research and Development, Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
Dinggang ShenDepartment of Research and Development, Shanghai United Imaging Intelligence Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
United Imaging Healthcare (China) · CNHangzhou First People's Hospital · CNSouthern Medical University · CNShanghaiTech University · CNSichuan University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CNZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischemic stroke is the most common type of stroke, ranked as the second leading cause of death worldwide. The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) is considered as a systematic method of assessing ischemic change on non-contrast CT scans (NCCT) of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients, while still suffering from the requirement of experts' experience and also the inconsistent results between readers. In this study, we proposed an automated ASPECTS method to utilize the powerful learning ability of neural networks for objectively scoring CT scans of AIS patients. First, we proposed to use the CT perfusion (CTP) from one-stop stroke imaging to provide the golden standard of ischemic regions for ASPECTS scoring. Second, we designed an asymmetry network to capture features when comparing the left and right sides for each ASPECTS region to estimate its ischemic status. Third, we performed experiments in a large main dataset of 870 patients, as well as an independent testing dataset consisting of 207 patients with radiologists' scorings. Experimental results show that our network achieved remarkable performance, as sensitivity and accuracy of 93.7 and 92.4% in the main dataset, and 95.5 and 91.3% in the independent testing dataset, respectively. In the latter dataset, our analysis revealed a high positive correlation between the ASPECTS score and the prognosis of patients in 90DmRs. Also, we found ASPECTS score is a good indicator of the size of CTP core volume of an infraction. The proposed method shows its potential for automated ASPECTS scoring on NCCT images.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaDeep LearningIschemic StrokeStrokeAlbertaHumansRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedASPECTSasymmetrydeep learningischemicstroke

Identifiers

PMID35357053
PMCPMC9189036
OpenAlexW4221090071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.