Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35357050›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2022

The role of melanopsin photoreception on visual attention linked pupil responses.

Subodh Gnyawali, Beatrix Feigl, Prakash Adhikari, Andrew J Zele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Subodh GnyawaliMelanopsin Photoreception and Visual Science Laboratories, Centre for Vision and Eye Research, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1923-6278
Beatrix FeiglMelanopsin Photoreception and Visual Science Laboratories, Centre for Vision and Eye Research, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7198-7373
Prakash AdhikariMelanopsin Photoreception and Visual Science Laboratories, Centre for Vision and Eye Research, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4834-8500
Andrew J ZeleMelanopsin Photoreception and Visual Science Laboratories, Centre for Vision and Eye Research, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0291-9929

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A decision during a visual task is marked by a task-evoked pupil dilation (TEPD) that is linked to the global cortical arousal state. Melanopsin expressing intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) form the afferent pathway for this pupil response. Melanopsin activation also influences mood and arousal and increases activity in decision-making brain areas that receive direct ipRGC projections. Here, an optical photostimulation method controlled the excitations of all five photoreceptor classes in the human eye to isolate melanopsin-mediated photoreception. We hypothesised that the TEPD can be driven by directing active visual covert attention through the ipRGC pathway. When observers are completely certain of the stimulus presence, melanopsin-directed stimulation produces a TEPD of similar amplitude to a cone-directed stimulation, with their combination producing larger amplitudes. This dilation is satisfactorily modelled by linear addition with a higher melanopsin weighting in ipRGCs. Visual reaction times were longest in response to melanopsin-directed lights. Next, we asked whether the afferent photoreceptor input and decision certainty, controlled by priming the observer's a priori expectation, interact to drive the TEPD. Signal detection analysis showed that by fixing the predecision certainty (bias), the phasic arousal and TEPD amplitude vary with observer criterion (c') and sensitivity (d') but not with preferential activation of melanopsin. The signature feature of the melanopsin response during attention was a biphasic TEPD. We conclude that active covert attention can be modulated by visual information mediated via ipRGCs, but that phasic arousal responses marked using the TEPD are not increased by higher levels of melanopsin activation.

Indexed as

PupilRod OpsinsHumansLightMelanopsinPhotic StimulationRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsRetinal Ganglion CellsMelanopsinRod Opsinsdecision-makingmelanopsinphasic arousalreaction timetask-evoked pupil dilationvisual attention

Identifiers

PMID35357050
PMCPMC9324975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.