SynthesisArtificial organs2022
Technology landscape of pediatric mechanical circulatory support devices: A systematic review 2010-2021.
Synthesis in Artificial organs, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric Versus Adult Shear-Induced Hemolysis: Are Age-Related Blood Properties the Main Cause for Differences?Artificial organs · 2026Article
- Advancement of the Dragon Heart 7-Series for Pediatric Patients With Heart Failure.Artificial organs · 2025Article
- Series Multiblood Pump Design With Dual Activation for Pediatric Patients With Heart Failure.ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992) · 2025Article
- Current status and future directions in pediatric ventricular assist device.Heart failure reviews · 2024Review
- Practical Comparison of Two- and Three-Phase Bearingless Permanent Magnet Slice Motors for Blood Pumps.Actuators · 2024Article
- Next Generation Development of Hybrid Continuous Flow Pediatric Total Artificial Heart Technology: Design-Build-Test.ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992) · 2023Article
- Development of the Centrifugal Blood Pump for a Hybrid Continuous Flow Pediatric Total Artificial Heart: Model, Make, Measure.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices, such as ventricular assist devices (VADs) and total artificial hearts (TAHs), have become a vital therapeutic option in the treatment of end-stage heart failure for adult patients. Such therapeutic options continue to be limited for pediatric patients. Clinicians initially adapted or scaled existing adult devices for pediatric patients; however, these adult devices are not designed to support the anatomical structure and varying flow capacities required for this population and are generally operated "off-design," which risks complications such as hemolysis and thrombosis. Devices designed specifically for the pediatric population which seek to address these shortcomings are now emerging and gaining FDA approval.
methodsTo analyze the competitive landscape of pediatric MCS devices, we conducted a systematic literature review. Approximately 27 devices were studied in detail: 8 were established or previously approved designs, and 19 were under development (11 VADs, 5 Fontan assist devices, and 3 TAHs).
resultsDespite significant progress, there is still no pediatric pump technology that satisfies the unique and distinct design constraints and requirements to support pediatric patients, including the wide range of patient sizes, increased cardiovascular demand with growth, and anatomic and physiologic heterogeneity of congenital heart disease.
conclusionsForward-thinking design solutions are required to overcome these challenges and to ensure the translation of new therapeutic MCS devices for pediatric patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.