Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35356946›Full record

ArticleMedicine2022

Clinical outcomes and etiology of acquired sixth cranial nerve palsy.

Shin Yeop Oh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neurosyphilis Presenting with Isolated Abducens Nerve Palsy.Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shin Yeop OhDepartment of Ophthalmology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, SungkyunkwanUniversity School of Medicine, Changwon, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8850-7783
Sungkyunkwan University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractThe objective of this study was to investigate the difference in clinical features according to age and factors affecting recovery of acquired sixth cranial nerve (CN6) palsy.A total of 156 patients with acute CN6 palsy between March 2016 and August 2021 who were followed up for at least 3 months were included in this study. Etiology, rate of recovery, and factors associated with recovery were retrospectively investigated.The average age of patients with CN6 palsy was about 60years and the mean duration of recovery was about 2.5 months. Of 156 patients, 72 (46.15%) had a microvascular etiology and 25 (16.03%) patients had a brain vascular lesions. Brain neoplasm, trauma, and "others" were found in 10 (6.41%), 11 (7.05%), and 15 (9.62%) patients, respectively. Among the total of 156 patients, 28 (17.95%) failed to completely recover. Non-isolated CN6 palsy with other cranial nerve palsies were recorded in 29 (18.59%) cases. Comparison of age (<50years vs ≥50years), between recovery and non-recovery groups showed that etiology was significantly different.The recovery rate of acquired CN6 palsy was about 82% and about 27% of patients had brain lesions. Also, varying rates and duration of recovery were found according to etiology, so we should be pay attention to diagnosis of causative disease in CN6 palsy patients.

Indexed as

Abducens Nerve DiseasesCranial Nerve DiseasesTrochlear Nerve DiseasesBrainChildHumansInfantMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35356946
PMCPMC10684240
OpenAlexW4220952349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.