SynthesisMedicine2022
Synergistic effect of Mahaenggamseok-tang in the treatment of pediatric patients with lower respiratory tract infections: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInfants are often hospitalized because of lower respiratory tract infections, and overuse of antibiotics to treat such infections has led to severe problems. Herbal medicines may be more effective and safer than antibiotics. Mahaenggamseok-tang is a common herbal medicine in Asia, but the evidence for its effectiveness in lower respiratory tract infection treatment is insufficient. This review assesses the efficacy of Mahaenggamseok-tang in treating lower respiratory tract infections.
methodsThe study used Chinese, English, and Korean databases, as well as one Japanese database. All included studies were randomized controlled trials comparing Mahaenggamseok-tang with medication to treat lower respiratory tract infections. Studies using Mahaenggamseok-tang plus Western medicine were also included. Standardized mean difference (SMD), risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), and risk of bias were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 software. The GRADEpro website was used to assess the reviews.
resultsSeventeen randomized controlled trials with a total of 1993 participants were included in the meta-analysis. All studies compared the Mahaenggamseok-tang plus Western medicine group to the Western medicine only group. Meta-analysis showed that Mahaenggamseok-tang affected total effective rate (risk ratio: 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-1.31, P < .001), cough disappearance time (SMD: -1.62, 95% CI: -2.30 to -0.95, P < .001), fever disappearance time (SMD: -2.04, 95% CI: -2.87 to -1.21, P < .001), abnormal lung sound disappearance time (SMD: -1.68, 95% CI: -2.43 to -0.93, P < .001), Creactive protein (SMD: -3.18, 95% CI: -4.36 to -1.99, P < .001), procalcitonin (SMD: -5.04, 95% CI: -9.20 to -0.88, P < .05), tumor necrosis factor-α (SMD: -0.84, 95% CI: -1.46 to -0.23, P < .01), IgE (SMD: -2.69, 95% CI: -2.91 to -2.47, P < .001), and adverse events (risk ratio: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.29-0.68, P < .001), but not interleukin-6 (SMD: -1.59, 95% CI: -3.48 to 0.30, P>.05). DISCUSSION: Mahaenggamseok-tang plus Western medicine is more effective and safer than Western medicine alone for treating lower respiratory tract infections. However, the included randomized controlled trials were not randomized well; therefore, better randomized randomized controlled trials are needed to make significant recommendations.PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020165698.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.