ArticleHealth science reports2022
Normative data for three physical frailty parameters in an aging, rural Indian population.
Article in Health science reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Asian Reference Values for Handgrip Strength, Gait Speed, Five-Times-Sit-to-Stand Test, Muscle Mass and Calf Circumference.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2026Article
- Nonlinear thresholds in lipid-frailty interplay: Precision targets for severe airflow limitation in aging adults.PloS one · 2026Article
- Inflammatory biomarkers and sarcopenia in older adults.Frontiers in aging · 2026Article
- To assess fall risk in the elderly OPD patients using conventional fall risk tool and Kinesis QTUG device: A comparative study.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2025Article
- Poorer performance on physical frailty-related parameters is associated with depression among older rural Indians.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Frailty: a global health challenge in need of local action.BMJ global health · 2024Review
- Longitudinal Quantiles of Frailty Trajectories Considering Death: New Insights into Sex and Cohort Differences in the Reference Curves for Frailty Progression of Older European.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024Article
- Gender Differences in Determinants of the Components of the Frailty Phenotype among Older Adults in India: Findings from LASI Wave-1.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Normative data for three physical frailty parameters in an aging, rural Indian population.Health science reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Physical frailty is associated with multiple adverse health outcomes. Since physical characteristics markedly vary with different populations, population-specific norms for physical frailty parameters are necessary. Such norms are lacking for the Indian population, especially for older, rural Indians. We aimed to develop normative values for three quantitative, frailty parameters-handgrip strength, "Timed Up-and-Go" (TUG) test time, and physical activity in an aging, rural Indian population. Methods: The study sample is from an ongoing, prospective, cohort (Srinivaspura NeuoSenescence and COGnition, SANSCOG) comprised of rural, community-dwelling, cognitively healthy, aging Indians. Subjects are recruited through area sampling strategy, from villages of Srinivaspura, Kolar district, Karnataka state, India. Three physical frailty parameters of Fried's phenotype-handgrip strength ( Results: The 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th percentiles for the three frailty parameters were: right-hand grip strength (kg): males-13.9, 18.6, 23.8, 28.7, 33.7 and females-7.8, 10.6, 14.2, 17.9, 21.3; left-hand grip strength (kg): males-13.3, 18.3, 23.6, 28.9, 32.9 and females-7.9, 10.5, 14.3, 17.8, 21.2; TUG time (s): males-9.1, 10.1, 11.4, 13.4, 15.5 and females-9.5, 10.7, 12.4, 14.5, 16.6; physical activity (MET-minutes/week): males-1680; 4320; 8880; 15,840; 23,352 and females-1680; 4320; 9240; 15,120; 20,160. Discussion: Our findings show that from 45 years onwards, overall grip strength decreases and TUG time increases, with women performing significantly poorer than men across all age groups, except >75 years, where no differences were seen. Physical activity did not show any consistent trend according to age or gender. Reference values for this aging, rural Indian population were substantially lower for grip strength and higher for TUG time than aging populations in several Western and other Asian countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.