ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2021
A Deep-Learning Aided Diagnostic System in Assessing Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip on Pediatric Pelvic Radiographs.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in the diagnostic imaging of developmental dysplasia of the hip: a systematic review.EFORT open reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence to Detect Developmental Dysplasia of Hip: A Systematic Review.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2025Pooled it
- Enhancing Medical Students' Disease Detection Skills: Leveraging Artificial Intelligence Software for Diagnosing Developmental Dysplasia Using Ultrasound Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based automatic measurement of the femoral head ossification center in healthy Korean children: development of a novel radiographic growth chart.European radiology · 2026Article
- Determination of Modified Waldenström Staging in Legg-Calvé-Perthes Disease Using Deep Learning.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the reliability of novel pelvic X-ray assessment software: CalculOrther.Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica · 2026Article
- Assessing deep learning accuracy in the measurement of radiographic parameters in pediatric hip X-rays.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Current Advances of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Orthopaedics: A Focus on Hip Surgery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in orthopedics: fundamentals, current applications, and future perspectives.Military Medical Research · 2025Review
- A dataset for quality evaluation of pelvic X-ray and diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Orthopedics: A Comprehensive Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Current and Emerging Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging for Paediatric Hip Disorders-A Scoping Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Characterizing hip joint morphology using a multitask deep learning model.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2025Review
- Deep learning-based automated measurement of hip key angles and auxiliary diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal imaging: realistic clinical applications in the next decade.Skeletal radiology · 2024Review
- H2A monoubiquitination: insights from human genetics and animal models.Human genetics · 2024Review
- Enhancing YOLO5 for the Assessment of Irregular Pelvic Radiographs with Multimodal Information.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence in foot and ankle surgery: current concepts.Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Assessing Acetabular Index Angle in Infants: A Deep Learning-Based Novel Approach.Journal of imaging · 2023Article
- A novel approach for screening standard anteroposterior pelvic radiographs in children.European journal of pediatrics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a common orthopedic disease in children. In clinical surgery, it is essential to quickly and accurately locate the exact position of the lesion, and there are still some controversies relating to DDH status. We adopt artificial intelligence (AI) to solve the above problems. Methods: In this paper, automatic DDH measurements and classifications were achieved using a three-stage pipeline. In the first stage, we used Mask-RCNN to detect the local features of the image and segment the bony pelvis, including the ilium, pubis, ischium, and femoral heads. For the second stage, local image patches focused on semantically related areas for DDH landmarks were extracted by high-resolution network (HRNet). In the third stage, some radiographic results are obtained. In the above process, we used 1,265 patient x-ray samples as the training set and 133 samples from two other medical institutions as the verification set. The results of AI were compared with three orthopedic surgeons for reliability and time consumption. Results: AI-aided diagnostic system's Tönnis and International Hip Dysplasia Institute (IHDI) classification accuracies for both hips ranged from 0.86 to 0.95. The measurements of numerical indices showed that there was no statistically significant difference between surgeons and AI. Tönnis and IHDI indicators were similar across the AI system, intermediate surgeon, and junior surgeon. Among some objective interpretation indicators, such as acetabular index and CE angle, there were good stability and consistency among the four observers. Intraclass consistency of acetabular index and CE angle among surgeons was 0.79-0.98, while AI was 1.00. The measurement time required by AI was significantly less than that of the doctors. Conclusion: The AI-aided diagnosis system can quickly and automatically measure important parameters and improve the quality of clinical diagnosis and screening referral process with a convenient and efficient way.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.