Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35356704›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of studies in nursing2021

A Comparative Study of Health Disparities in Cervical Cancer Mortality Rates Through Time Between Black and Caucasian Women in Alabama and the US.

Ehsan Abdalla, Tsegaye Habtemariam, Souleymane Fall, Roberta Troy, Berhanu Tameru, David Nganwa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of studies in nursing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Unequal paths to care: a scoping review of access and cancer outcomes in Alabama.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Review
  2. Environmental factors shaping cancer outcomes in Alabama: A scoping review.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ehsan AbdallaDepartment of Graduate Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Tuskegee University, USA.
Tsegaye HabtemariamDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Tuskegee University, USA.
Souleymane FallCollege of Agriculture, Environment and Nutrition Sciences, Tuskegee University, USA.
Roberta TroyInterim Provost & Vice President for Academic Affairs, Office of the Provost, Tuskegee University, USA.
Berhanu TameruDepartment of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Tuskegee University, USA.
David NganwaDepartment of Graduate Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Tuskegee University, USA.

Funding

Tuskegee University Center for Biomedical Research/ Research Centers at Minority InstitutionsU54MD007585 · NIMHD · TUSKEGEE UNIVERSITY · PI Clayton Yates · 2017 to 2026
$29.4M
INFRASTRUCTURE IIG12MD007585 · NIMHD · TUSKEGEE UNIVERSITY · PI YATES, CLAYTON · 2012 to 2016
$4.6M
NIMHD NIH HHS G12 MD007585NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD007585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The main purpose of this study was to assess changes in cervical cancer mortality rates through time between Black and Caucasian women residing in Alabama and the US. Methods: Alabama cervical cancer mortality rates (MR), percentage differences, percentage changes and annual percentage changes for trends were compared with the US baseline and target rates. The US Baseline data and target objectives of utilization of cervical cancer screening and MR were obtained from Healthy People 2020. The cervical cancer behavioral risk factors and utilization of screening tests data were obtained from CDC's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). The cervical cancer MR data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER). The analysis was done using SEER*Stat and Linear Trendlines analysis. Results: Although Blacks in Alabama had higher cervical cancer MR through times, a decreasing trend was noted for both races. However, in Alabama, there is no significant change in Blacks aged 65 years and older in cervical cancer MR, despite a high screening rate compared to Whites. In contrast, between 2002 and 2012, Whites in Alabama and the US made a significant progress toward the Healthy People 2020 goal. Conclusions: In Alabama, there exists cervical cancer MR disparity in Blacks despite the higher rates of screening for cervical cancer as would otherwise be expected. The state has not yet achieved the Healthy People 2020 goal. Public health officials should monitor progress toward reduction and/or elimination of these disparities by focusing in a follow up of screening.

Indexed as

cervical cancerhealthy people 2020mortality ratepap smear

Identifiers

PMID35356704
PMCPMC8963192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.