ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2022
Recombinant porcine factor VIII in acquired hemophilia A: Experience from two patients and literature review.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcomes of Emicizumab in Acquired Hemophilia Patients: A Systematic Review.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisPooled it
- Sequential Use of Recombinant Porcine Factor VIII and Early Emicizumab in Acquired Hemophilia A: A Case Series.EJHaem · 2026Article
- A Rare Case of Life-Threatening Hemorrhage.Cureus · 2024Article
- Genetics and Epigenetics in Acquired Hemophilia A: From Bench to Bedside.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Review
- Analytical Performance of Different Laboratory Methods for Measuring Susoctocog-Alfa.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Recombinant porcine factor VIII in acquired hemophilia A: Experience from two patients and literature review.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a disease caused by antibody formation inhibiting the function of factor VIII, causing bleeding. Recombinant porcine factor VIII (rpFVIII) escapes human FVIII antibody recognition and can provide life-saving hemostasis. However, the development of antibodies against pFVIII can limit its use. We report two cases in which loss of response to rpFVIII occurred, likely because of inhibiting antibodies. In case 1, the patient achieved hemostasis but lost response to rpFVIII within a few days. In the second case, rpFVIII controlled bleeding but the patient experienced diminishing half-life of rpFVIII infusions over time, necessitating a switch to emicizumab which provided lasting hemostasis. Key Clinical Question: Based on our experience with these cases, we reviewed the available literature regarding the use of rpFVIII in AHA. The Key Clinical Question was to determine how often inhibitors were associated with rpFVIII treatment failure. Clinical approach and conclusions: We identified 43 AHA patients across five studies who were treated with rpFVIII. Twenty-two patients (51%) developed pFVIII inhibitors and seven cases (16%) reported loss of efficacy associated with an inhibitor. In conclusion, rpFVIII can be a life-saving therapy in AHA. However, clinicians should be aware that pFVIII antibody development can reduce the efficacy and duration of response. Recombinant pFVIII's limitations support the utility of further investigation of alternative therapies such as emicizumab in early AHA management.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.