Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35356658›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2022

Children of more empowered women are less likely to be left without vaccination in low- and middle-income countries: A global analysis of 50 DHS surveys.

Andrea Wendt, Thiago M Santos, Bianca O Cata-Preta, Janaína C Costa, Tewodaj Mengistu, Daniel R Hogan, Cesar G Victora, Aluísio J D Barros

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea WendtInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Thiago M SantosInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Bianca O Cata-PretaInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Janaína C CostaInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Tewodaj MengistuGavi, the Vaccine Alliance, Geneva, Switzerland.
Daniel R HoganGavi, the Vaccine Alliance, Geneva, Switzerland.
Cesar G VictoraInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Aluísio J D BarrosInternational Center for Equity in Health, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Pelotas · BRGavi · CH

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To help provide a global understanding of the role of gender-related barriers to vaccination, we have used a broad measure of women's empowerment and explored its association with the prevalence of zero-dose children aged 12-23 months across many low- and middle-income countries, using data from standardized national household surveys. Methods: We used data from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) of 50 countries with information on both women's empowerment and child immunisation. Zero-dose was operationally defined as the proportion of children who failed to receive any doses of the diphtheria, pertussis, and tetanus containing vaccines (DPT). We measured women's empowerment using the SWPER Global, an individual-level indicator estimated for women aged 15-49 years who are married or in union and with three domains: social independence, decision-making and attitude towards violence. We estimated two summary measures of inequality, the slope index of inequality (SII) and the concentration index (CIX). Results were presented for individual and pooled countries. Results: In the country-level (ecological) analyses we found that the higher the proportion of women with high empowerment, the lower the zero-dose prevalence. In the individual level analyses, overall, children with highly-empowered mothers presented lower prevalence of zero-dose than those with less-empowered mothers. The social independence domain presented more consistent associations with zero-dose. In 42 countries, the lowest zero-dose prevalence was found in the high empowerment groups, with the slope index of inequality showing significant results in 28 countries. When we pooled all countries using a multilevel Poisson model, children from mothers in the low and medium levels of the social independence domain had respectively 3.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.3, 4.7) and 1.8 (95% CI = 1.5, 2.1) times higher prevalence of zero-dose compared to those in the high level. Conclusions: Our country-level and individual-level analyses support the importance of women's empowerment for child vaccination, especially in countries with weaker routine immunisation programs.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesIncomeAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansImmunization ProgramsInfantMiddle AgedVaccinationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID35356658
PMCPMC8943525
OpenAlexW4221066955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.