ArticleJournal of hematology2022
Consensus Statement: Importance of Timely Access to Multiple Myeloma Diagnosis and Treatment in Central America and the Caribbean.
Article in Journal of hematology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global landscape and trends in lifetime risks of haematologic malignancies in 185 countries: population-based estimates from GLOBOCAN 2022.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Article
- Optimising multiple myeloma therapy in resource-limited settings: current perspectives and challenges.Ecancermedicalscience · 2025Review
- Review
- Non-Conventional Allogeneic Anti-BCMA Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Based Immune Cell Therapies for Multiple Myeloma Treatment.Cancers · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In Central America and the Caribbean, multiple myeloma (MM) patients face significant barriers to diagnosis and treatment. The aim of this study is to describe the current situation of MM in the region, discuss the current barriers to timely diagnosis and proper treatment, and develop consensus recommendations to address these issues. Methods: Nine experts from five countries took part in a virtual consensus meeting on MM in Central America and the Caribbean. During the meeting, experts analyzed the disease burden, the current conditions for disease management, and access to treatment in the region. The participants reached a consensus on the extent of the problem and the necessary measures. Results: Hard evidence on the incidence and prevalence of MM in the region is scarce, but the experts perceive an increase in MM cases. The lack of data on the direct and indirect costs at the local and regional levels obscures the impact of the disease and limits awareness among decision-makers. Most patients are diagnosed late and face long waiting times and geographical barriers to access treatment. Access to efficacious innovative therapies that increase survival time is limited due to access barriers within health systems. Conclusions: There was consensus on five recommendations: 1) to generate evidence; 2) to educate the public; 3) to increase timely diagnosis and facilitate access to treatment; 4) to promote interaction, collaboration, and participation among all sectors involved in the decision-making process; and 5) to guarantee timely access to new therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.