Trial reportJournal of healthcare engineering2022
Effect of Uterine Artery Ligation and Uterine Artery Embolization on Postpartum Hemorrhage Due to Uterine Asthenia after Cesarean Section and Its Effect on Blood Flow and Function of Uterine and Ovarian Arteries.
Trial report in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pregnancy rate and outcomes after uterine artery embolization for women: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Temporary clamping of the uterine arteries versus coventional technique for the prevention of postpartum hemorrage during cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Trial
- Retracted: Effect of Uterine Artery Ligation and Uterine Artery Embolization on Postpartum Hemorrhage Due to Uterine Asthenia after Cesarean Section and Its Effect on Blood Flow and Function of Uterine and Ovarian Arteries.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-09-27Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/1FE2D604DA6274D4B72F79698A5C86
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the efficacy of uterine artery ligation (UAL) and uterine artery embolization (UAE) in the treatment of uterine asthenia postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) after cesarean section and its effect on uterine and ovarian artery blood flow and function. Methods: 100 patients with uterine asthenia PPH after cesarean section in our hospital from January 2018 to November 2020 were randomly divided into 50 cases in the UAL group and 50 cases in the UAE group. They were followed up for 12 months. The bleeding volume, operation time, immediate hemostasis rate, and hemostasis effective rate; lochia clearance time and menstrual rehydration time; RI and S/D; and serum FSH, E2, and LH levels were compared between the two groups. Results: Compared with the UAL group, the amount of bleeding in the UAE group was significantly increased and the operation time was significantly shortened ( Conclusion: The efficacy of UAL and UAE in the treatment of PPH with uterine asthenia after cesarean section and its effect on the blood flow and function of uterine and ovarian arteries are equivalent, but the amount of bleeding in UAL is less and the operation time of UAE is shorter. The appropriate operation method can be selected according to the actual situation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.