Trial reportJournal of healthcare engineering2022
Radiofrequency Ablation Combined with Radioactive Seed Implantation for Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer.
Trial report in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Retracted: Radiofrequency Ablation Combined with Radioactive Seed Implantation for Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2023Article
- Image-guided percutaneous ablation for lung malignancies.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-10-11Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate the value of radiofrequency ablation combined with radioactive seed implantation in nonsmall cell lung cancer treatment. 30 patients with primary nonsmall cell lung cancer were randomly divided into two groups. Group A was treated with radiofrequency ablation combined with radiation seed implantation, and group B was treated with radiofrequency ablation only. We compared the incidence of complications in the two groups and reviewed the effective percentage every 3 months. All patients were treated successfully, and there were no deaths during treatment. There were no deaths and no cases of distant organ metastasis in nine months of follow-up. There were no significant differences in treatment-related complications between the two groups. The early postoperative (three and six months) effective percentage was not significantly different (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.