Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35356604›Full record

ArticleOcular oncology and pathology2022

A Prediction Model to Discriminate Small Choroidal Melanoma from Choroidal Nevus.

Emily C Zabor, Vishal Raval, Shiming Luo, David E Pelayes, Arun D Singh

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ocular oncology and pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Imaging-based machine learning for the diagnosis and prognosis of uveal melanoma: a systematic review and meta analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Advances in multimodal imaging for diagnosis of pigmented ocular fundus lesions.Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie · 2024
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emily C ZaborTaussig Cancer Institute, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Vishal RavalCole Eye Institute, Ophthalmic Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Shiming LuoCole Eye Institute, Ophthalmic Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
David E PelayesDepartment of Ophthalmology, Buenos Aires University and Maimonides University, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Arun D SinghCole Eye Institute, Ophthalmic Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Cleveland Clinic · USUniversidad Maimónides · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to develop a validated machine learning model to diagnose small choroidal melanoma. Design: This is a cohort study. Subjects Participants and/or Controls: The training data included 123 patients diagnosed as small choroidal melanocytic tumor (5.0-16.0 mm in largest basal diameter and 1.0 mm-2.5 mm in height; Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study criteria). Those diagnosed as melanoma ( Methods: In the training data, lasso logistic regression was used to select variables for inclusion in the final model for the association with melanoma versus choroidal nevus. Internal and external validation was performed to assess model performance. Main Outcome Measures: The main outcome measure is the predicted probability of small choroidal melanoma. Results: Distance to optic disc ≥3 mm and drusen were associated with decreased odds of melanoma, whereas male versus female sex, increased height, subretinal fluid, and orange pigment were associated with increased odds of choroidal melanoma. The area under the receiver operating characteristic "discrimination value" for this model was 0.880. The top four variables that were most frequently selected for inclusion in the model on internal validation, implying their importance as predictors of melanoma, were subretinal fluid, height, distance to optic disc, and orange pigment. When tested against the validation data, the prediction model could distinguish between choroidal nevus and melanoma with a high discrimination of 0.861. The final prediction model was converted into an online calculator to generate predicted probability of melanoma. Conclusions: To minimize diagnostic uncertainty, a machine learning-based diagnostic prediction calculator can be readily applied for decision-making and counseling patients with small choroidal melanoma.

Indexed as

IndeterminateMachine learningNevusPredictionSmall melanoma

Identifiers

PMID35356604
PMCPMC8914269
OpenAlexW4200082085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.