ReviewEcology and evolution2022
Winners and losers of land use change: A systematic review of interactions between the world's crane species (
Review in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Habitat- and Stage-Associated Variation in Food Resources, Foraging-Attempt Rates, and Behavioral Time Allocation of Wintering Black-Necked Cranes in Linzhou County, XiZang.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Age-Specific Survival Estimation of a Eurasian Crane Population Highlights a Long-Term Decline in Juvenile Survival.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Northern migration patterns and winter habitat use of hooded cranes (Grus monacha) in Suncheon Bay, South Korea.BMC ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Drones as a tool to study and monitor endangered Grey Crowned Cranes (Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- How effective are interventions to reduce damage to agricultural crops from herbivorous wild birds and mammals? A systematic review protocol.Environmental evidence · 2023Review
- Analysis of Crop Consumption Using Scatological Samples from the Red-Crowned CraneAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Breeding and migration performance metrics highlight challenges for White-naped Cranes.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Winners and losers of land use change: A systematic review of interactions between the world's crane species (Ecology and evolution · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While agricultural intensification and expansion are major factors driving loss and degradation of natural habitat and species decline, some wildlife species also benefit from agriculturally managed habitats. This may lead to high population densities with impacts on both human livelihoods and wildlife conservation. Cranes are a group of 15 species worldwide, affected both negatively and positively by agricultural practices. While eleven species face critical population declines, numbers of common cranes (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.