Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35356560›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2022

Rare, common, alien and native species follow different rules in an understory plant community.

Sarah Reeve, David C Deane, Chris McGrannachan, Gillis Horner, Cang Hui, Melodie McGeoch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A nature-positive future with biological invasions: theory, decision support and research needs.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah ReeveSchool of Biological Sciences Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9705-7887
David C DeaneSchool of Life Sciences Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environment La Trobe University Bundoora Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2144-624X
Chris McGrannachanManaaki Whenua-Landcare Research Auckland New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3968-2646
Gillis HornerSchool of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences University of Melbourne Richmond Victoria Australia.
Cang HuiCentre for Invasion Biology Department of Mathematical Sciences Stellenbosch University Matieland South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3660-8160
Melodie McGeochSchool of Biological Sciences Monash University Melbourne Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3388-2241

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological invasions are a leading threat to biodiversity globally. Increasingly, ecosystems experience multiple introductions, which can have significant effects on patterns of diversity. The way these communities assemble will depend partly on whether rare and common alien species respond to environmental predictors in the same manner as rare and common native species, but this is not well understood. To examine this question across four national parks in south-eastern Australia, we sampled the understory plant community of eucalypt-dominated dry forest subject to multiple plant introductions. The drivers of diversity and turnover in alien and native species of contrasting frequency of occurrence (low, intermediate, and high) were each tested individually. We found alien species diversity and turnover were both strongly associated with abiotic conditions (e.g., soil pH), while distance had little influence because of the greater extent of occurrence and more homogeneous composition of common aliens. In contrast, native species diversity was not associated with abiotic conditions and their turnover was as strongly influenced by distance as by abiotic conditions. In both alien and native species, however, the most important predictors of turnover changed with frequency of occurrence. Although local coexistence appears to be facilitated by life history trade-offs, species richness of aliens and natives was negatively correlated and native species might face greater competition in areas with more neutral soils (e.g., pH > ~5.5) where alien richness and relative frequency were both highest. We conclude that diversity and turnover in the generally more widespread alien species are mainly driven by species sorting along an environmental gradient associated with pH and nutrient availability, whereas turnover of native species is driven by more neutral processes associated with dispersal limitation. We show alien and native plant species respond to different environmental factors, as do rare and common species within each component.

Indexed as

biological invasioncompositional turnoverdistance decayenvironmental filteringmultispecies introductionunderstory plant community structurezeta diversity

Identifiers

PMID35356560
PMCPMC8938312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.