Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35356502›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Drainage Tube Placement May Not Be Necessary During Endoscopic Thyroidectomy Bilateral Areola Approach: A Preliminary Report.

Yukai Chen, Chengchen Wang, Binglong Bai, Mao Ye, Junjie Ma, Jingying Zhang, Zhiyu Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yukai ChenDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Chengchen WangDepartment of General Surgery, International Medical Center of Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Binglong BaiDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Mao YeDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Junjie MaDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Jingying ZhangDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Zhiyu LiDepartment of Thyroid Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The endoscopic thyroidectomy bilateral areola approach (ETBAA) improved cosmetic outcomes significantly and is now widely applied. The usage of drainage tubes is controversial in conventional open thyroidectomy (COT), but studies about drainage placement decisions during ETBAA are still limited. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of having no drainage tube applied during ETBAA on patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma. Methods: The clinical data of patients undergoing ETBAA from July 2018 to May 2021 was retrospectively collected. The patients were divided into two groups based on drain placement: no-drain and drain. The two groups were matched at a ratio of 1:1. Fifty-five patients from each group were finally included. Postoperative complications and follow-up data were compared between the two groups. Results: No significant difference was observed between the two groups in the incidence of postoperative complications, including hemorrhage, surgical site infection, and subcutaneous seroma. Compared with the drain group, the operation time of the no-drain group was significantly shorter [(107.75 ± 24.59) min vs. (119.91 ± 34.05) min, Conclusions: No drainage applied during ETBAA on papillary thyroid carcinoma is safe and feasible. This practice does not increase the risk of postoperative complications, but it does shorten the operation time and hospital stay, as well as reduce medical costs. Furthermore, it alleviates the suffering of patients.

Indexed as

areola approachcomplicationsdrainageendoscopic thyroidectomyhematomapapillary thyroid carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID35356502
PMCPMC8960029
OpenAlexW4220744657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.