Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35356493›Full record

ReviewDegenerative neurological and neuromuscular disease2022

Ponesimod in the Treatment of Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis: An Update on the Emerging Clinical Data.

Serena Ruggieri, Maria Esmeralda Quartuccio, Luca Prosperini

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Degenerative neurological and neuromuscular disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Automated production of radiotracer [Applied radiation and isotopes : including data, instrumentation and methods for use in agriculture, industry and medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Serena RuggieriDepartment of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University, Rome, 00185, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5287-3290
Maria Esmeralda QuartuccioDepartment of Neurosciences, S. Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, 00152, Italy.
Luca ProsperiniDepartment of Neurosciences, S. Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, 00152, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3237-6267
Carlo Forlanini Hospital · ITFondazione Santa Lucia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptors are bioactive lipid metabolites that bind five different types of receptors expressed ubiquitously in human body and mediate a broad range of biological functions. Targeting S1P receptors is nowadays a well-established pharmacological strategy to treat multiple sclerosis (MS). However, the adverse events associated with the ancestor (fingolimod), especially in terms of heart conduction and slow reversibility of its pharmacodynamics effect on lymphocytes, have stimulated a search for a S1P modulator with greater selectivity for S1P

Indexed as

disease-modifying treatmentsmultiple sclerosisponesimodsphingosine-1-phosphatesphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators

Identifiers

PMID35356493
PMCPMC8958267
OpenAlexW4220864417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.