ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2022
Endothelial Damage in Sepsis: The Importance of Systems Biology.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing Microcirculatory Therapies in Pediatric Sepsis: Current Opportunities and Future Directions.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Neutrophil extracellular traps offer a new therapeutic target for elephant endotheliotropic herpes virus-hemorrhagic disease (EEHV-HD).Communications biology · 2026Article
- The time course of fluid responsiveness.Annals of intensive care · 2026Review
- Crosstalk between innate immune signaling pathways and integrated TLR, NLRP3 inflammasome, cGAS-STING, and NF-κB networks in sepsis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Management of endothelial dysfunction in septic shock: role of albumin administration.Journal of intensive care · 2025Article
- Peripheral and Organ Perfusion's Role in Prognosis of Disease Severity and Mortality in Severe COVID-19 Patients: Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- The Modulation of Septic Shock: A Proteomic Approach.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Vascular leak in sepsis: physiological basis and potential therapeutic advances.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Review
- The association between prolonged capillary refill time and microcirculation changes in children with sepsis.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
- Predictive role of selected biomarkers in differentiating gram-positive from gram-negative sepsis in surgical patients: a retrospective study.Anaesthesiology intensive therapy · 2023Article
- lncRNA NEAT1/miR-495-3p regulates angiogenesis in burn sepsis through the TGF-β1 and SMAD signaling pathways.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2023Article
- The relationship between hematocrit and serum albumin levels difference and mortality in elderly sepsis patients in intensive care units-a retrospective study based on two large database.BMC infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Capillary refill time in sepsis: A useful and easily accessible tool for evaluating perfusion in children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The early diagnosis and appropriate stratification of sepsis continues to be one of the most important challenges in modern medicine. Single isolated biomarkers have not been enough to improve diagnostic and prognostic strategies and to progress toward therapeutic goals. The information generated by the human genome project has allowed a more holistic approach to the problem. The integration of genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics in sepsis has allowed us to progress in the knowledge of new pathways which are pathophysiologically involved in this disease. Thus, we have understood the importance of and complex interaction between the inflammatory response and the endothelium. Understanding the role of important parts of the microcirculation, such as the endothelial glycocalyx and its interaction with the inflammatory response, has provided early recognition elements for clinical practice that allow the rational use of traditional medical interventions in sepsis. This comprehensive approach, which differs from the classical mechanistic approach, uses systems biology to increase the diagnostic and prognostic spectrum of endothelial damage biomarkers in sepsis, and to provide information on new pathways involved in the pathophysiology of the disease. This, in turn, provides tools for perfecting traditional medical interventions, using them at the appropriate times according to the disease's pathophysiological context, while at the same time discovering new and improved therapeutic alternatives. We have the challenge of transferring this ideal scenario to our daily clinical practice to improve our patients' care. The purpose of this article is to provide a general description of the importance of systems biology in integrating the complex interaction between the endothelium and the inflammatory response in sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.