Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35356388›Full record

ReviewClinical and translational radiation oncology2022

The dogma of Cetuximab and Radiotherapy in head and neck cancer - A dawn to dusk journey.

Sapna Krishnamurthy, Imtiaz Ahmed, Rohan Bhise, Bidhu K Mohanti, Atul Sharma, Thorsten Rieckmann, Claire Paterson, Pierluigi Bonomo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Influential Factors on Survival in Laryngeal Cancer and Treatment Modalities Comparison.ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Radiation-induced skin injury in the head and neck region: pathogenesis, clinics, prevention, treatment considerations and proposal for management algorithm.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024
    Review
  12. Advances in molecular targeted therapies to increase efficacy of (chemo)radiation therapy.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Sapna KrishnamurthyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, KLES Belgaum Cancer Hospital & KLES Dr Prabhakar Kore Hospital and MRC, Belgaum, Karnataka, India.
Imtiaz AhmedDepartment of Radiation Oncology, KLES Belgaum Cancer Hospital & KLES Dr Prabhakar Kore Hospital and MRC, Belgaum, Karnataka, India.
Rohan BhiseProfessor of Medical Oncology, JN Medical College, KLES Belgaum Cancer Hospital & KLES Dr Prabhakar Kore Hospital and MRC, Belgaum, Karnataka, India.
Bidhu K MohantiProfessor of Radiation Oncology and Director, KIMS Cancer Centre, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneshwar, Orissa, India.
Atul SharmaProfessor of Medical Oncology, Dr. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Thorsten RieckmannDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Claire PatersonBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow G12 0YN, UK.
Pierluigi BonomoRadiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy.
KLE Society Hospital · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar · INAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre · GBDR. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital · INUniversität Hamburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the introduction of Cetuximab as a biological molecule against Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), its use in the cancers of head and neck region is widely explored. With the recognition that EGFR expression is associated with radioresistance and poor prognosis, incorporation of an anti-EGFR agent along with Radiotherapy (RT) is a logical and attractive option. Cetuximab in combination with RT as Bio-Radiotherapy (BRT) is considered one of the standard treatment modalities in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancers (LA-HNSCC). Many important phase-III clinical trials were undertaken simultaneously, where the use of Cetuximab BRT was tested in various clinical scenarios with different hypothesis. With the studies still ongoing and the results awaited, its use was continued in clinical practice. Today the results are out and definitely not encouraging. After the initial success, Cetuximab has miserably failed to win over cisplatin based chemoradiation which is the current standard of care in LA-HNSCC. Hence, it is the need of the hour to re-evaluate and define the present role of Cetuximab in the definitive management of LA-HNSCC in the light of the latest clinical evidence..

Indexed as

anti- EGFRBio-radiotherapyCetuximabChemoradiationHead and neck cancer

Identifiers

PMID35356388
PMCPMC8958314
OpenAlexW4220667624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.