Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35356148›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2021

Nomogram Predicts Risk and Prognostic Factors for Bone Metastasis of Pancreatic Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.

Wei Zhang, Lichen Ji, Xijun Wang, Senbo Zhu, Junchao Luo, Yin Zhang, Yu Tong, Fabo Feng, Yao Kang, Qing Bi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Wei ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Lichen JiDepartment of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Xijun WangDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
Senbo ZhuDepartment of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Junchao LuoDepartment of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Yin ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Yu TongDepartment of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Fabo FengDepartment of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Yao KangDepartment of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Qing BiDepartment of Orthopedics, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital · CNBengbu Medical College · CNHangzhou Medical College · CNSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CNWenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The overall survival (OS) of pancreatic cancer (PC) patients with bone metastasis (BM) is extremely low, and it is pretty hard to treat bone metastasis. However, there are currently no effective nomograms to predict the diagnosis and prognosis of pancreatic cancer with bone metastasis (PCBM). Therefore, it is of great significance to establish effective predictive models to guide clinical practice. Methods: We screened patients from Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2016. The independent risk factors of PCBM were identified from univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses, and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to determine independent prognostic factors affecting the prognosis of PCBM. In addition, two nomograms were constructed to predict the risk and prognosis of PCBM. We used the area under the curve (AUC), C-index and calibration curve to determine the predictive accuracy and discriminability of nomograms. The decision curve analysis (DCA) and Kaplan-Meier(K-M) survival curves were employed to further confirm the clinical effectiveness of the nomogram. Results: Multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that risk factors of PCBM included age, primary site, histological subtype, N stage, radiotherapy, surgery, brain metastasis, lung metastasis, and liver metastasis. Using Cox regression analyses, we found that independent prognostic factors of PCBM were age, race, grade, histological subtype, surgery, chemotherapy, and lung metastasis. We utilized nomograms to visually express data analysis results. The C-index of training cohort was 0.795 (95%CI: 0.758-0.832), whereas that of internal validation cohort was 0.800 (95%CI: 0.739-0.862), and the external validation cohort was 0.787 (95%CI: 0.746-0.828). Based on AUC of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA), we concluded that the risk and prognosis model of PCBM exhibits excellent performance. Conclusion: Nomogram is sufficiently accurate to predict the risk and prognostic factors of PCBM, allowing for individualized clinical decisions for future clinical work.

Indexed as

NomogramsPancreatic NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm StagingPrognosisSEER Programbone metastasisCox regressionlogistic regressionnomogrampancreatic cancerpredictorsSurveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database

Identifiers

PMID35356148
PMCPMC8959409
OpenAlexW4220820318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.