Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35356111›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Analysis of Few-Shot Techniques for Fungal Plant Disease Classification and Evaluation of Clustering Capabilities Over Real Datasets.

Itziar Egusquiza, Artzai Picon, Unai Irusta, Arantza Bereciartua-Perez, Till Eggers, Christian Klukas, Elisabete Aramendi, Ramon Navarra-Mestre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Itziar EgusquizaTECNALIA, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Parque Tecnológico de Bizkaia, Derio, Spain.
Artzai PiconTECNALIA, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Parque Tecnológico de Bizkaia, Derio, Spain.
Unai IrustaUniversity of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain.
Arantza Bereciartua-PerezTECNALIA, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Parque Tecnológico de Bizkaia, Derio, Spain.
Till EggersBASF SE, Limburgerhof, Germany.
Christian KlukasBASF SE, Limburgerhof, Germany.
Elisabete AramendiUniversity of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain.
Ramon Navarra-MestreBASF SE, Limburgerhof, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant fungal diseases are one of the most important causes of crop yield losses. Therefore, plant disease identification algorithms have been seen as a useful tool to detect them at early stages to mitigate their effects. Although deep-learning based algorithms can achieve high detection accuracies, they require large and manually annotated image datasets that is not always accessible, specially for rare and new diseases. This study focuses on the development of a plant disease detection algorithm and strategy requiring few plant images (Few-shot learning algorithm). We extend previous work by using a novel challenging dataset containing more than 100,000 images. This dataset includes images of leaves, panicles and stems of five different crops (barley, corn, rape seed, rice, and wheat) for a total of 17 different diseases, where each disease is shown at different disease stages. In this study, we propose a deep metric learning based method to extract latent space representations from plant diseases with just few images by means of a Siamese network and triplet loss function. This enhances previous methods that require a support dataset containing a high number of annotated images to perform metric learning and few-shot classification. The proposed method was compared over a traditional network that was trained with the cross-entropy loss function. Exhaustive experiments have been performed for validating and measuring the benefits of metric learning techniques over classical methods. Results show that the features extracted by the metric learning based approach present better discriminative and clustering properties. Davis-Bouldin index and Silhouette score values have shown that triplet loss network improves the clustering properties with respect to the categorical-cross entropy loss. Overall, triplet loss approach improves the DB index value by 22.7% and Silhouette score value by 166.7% compared to the categorical cross-entropy loss model. Moreover, the F-score parameter obtained from the Siamese network with the triplet loss performs better than classical approaches when there are few images for training, obtaining a 6% improvement in the F-score mean value. Siamese networks with triplet loss have improved the ability to learn different plant diseases using few images of each class. These networks based on metric learning techniques improve clustering and classification results over traditional categorical cross-entropy loss networks for plant disease identification.

Indexed as

categorical cross-entropy lossconvolutional neural networkfew-shot learningplant diseasetriplet loss

Identifiers

PMID35356111
PMCPMC8959904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.