Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35356083›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2022

Regional Differences in Mucociliary Clearance in the Upper and Lower Airways.

Troy D Rogers, Brian Button, Samir N P Kelada, Lawrence E Ostrowski, Alessandra Livraghi-Butrico, Mark I Gutay, Charles R Esther, Barbara R Grubb

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Neutralisation of SARS-CoV-2 by monoclonal antibody through dual targeting powder formulation.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2023
    Article
  15. Hydrogels for Mucosal Drug Delivery.ACS applied bio materials · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Troy D RogersMarsico Lung Institute, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Brian ButtonMarsico Lung Institute, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Samir N P KeladaMarsico Lung Institute, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Lawrence E OstrowskiMarsico Lung Institute, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Alessandra Livraghi-ButricoMarsico Lung Institute, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Mark I GutayMarsico Lung Institute, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Charles R EstherMarsico Lung Institute, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Barbara R GrubbMarsico Lung Institute, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Lung Institute · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

The role of mucus and pulmonary surface interactions in lung defenseR01HL125280 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUTTON, BRIAN M · 2015 to 2023
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL125280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the nasal cavity is the portal of entry for inspired air in mammals, this region is exposed to the highest concentration of inhaled particulate matter and pathogens, which must be removed to keep the lower airways sterile. Thus, one might expect vigorous removal of these substances via mucociliary clearance (MCC) in this region. We have investigated the rate of MCC in the murine nasal cavity compared to the more distal airways (trachea). The rate of MCC in the nasal cavity (posterior nasopharynx, PNP) was ∼3-4× greater than on the tracheal wall. This appeared to be due to a more abundant population of ciliated cells in the nasal cavity (∼80%) compared to the more sparsely ciliated trachea (∼40%). Interestingly, the tracheal ventral wall exhibited a significantly lower rate of MCC than the tracheal posterior membrane. The trachealis muscle underlying the ciliated epithelium on the posterior membrane appeared to control the surface architecture and likely in part the rate of MCC in this tracheal region. In one of our mouse models (

Indexed as

mucociliary clearancemucus blanketposterior nasopharynxtracheal posterior membranetracheal walls

Identifiers

PMID35356083
PMCPMC8959816
OpenAlexW4220847981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.