ReviewFrontiers in medical technology2022
Application of Transcriptomics for Predicting Protein Interaction Networks, Drug Targets and Drug Candidates.
Review in Frontiers in medical technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrative multi-transcriptomics and network pharmacology reveal natural therapeutics as anti-cancer agents targeting AURKA for ovarian cancer treatment.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Article
- Network-based bioinformatics for the prediction of candidate SNPs in Staphylococcus aureus virulence and resistance genes.Folia microbiologica · 2026Article
- A risk prediction model mediated by genes of APOD/APOC1/SQLE associates with prognosis in cervical cancer.BMC women's health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein interaction pathways and networks are critically-required for a vast range of biological processes. Improved discovery of candidate druggable proteins within specific cell, tissue and disease contexts will aid development of new treatments. Predicting protein interaction networks from gene expression data can provide valuable insights into normal and disease biology. For example, the resulting protein networks can be used to identify potentially druggable targets and drug candidates for testing in cell and animal disease models. The advent of whole-transcriptome expression profiling techniques-that catalogue protein-coding genes expressed within cells and tissues-has enabled development of individual algorithms for particular tasks. For example,: (i) gene ontology algorithms that predict gene/protein subsets involved in related cell processes; (ii) algorithms that predict intracellular protein interaction pathways; and (iii) algorithms that correlate druggable protein targets with known drugs and/or drug candidates. This review examines approaches, advantages and disadvantages of existing gene expression, gene ontology, and protein network prediction algorithms. Using this framework, we examine current efforts to combine these algorithms into pipelines to enable identification of druggable targets, and associated known drugs, using gene expression datasets. In doing so, new opportunities are identified for development of powerful algorithm pipelines, suitable for wide use by non-bioinformaticians, that can predict protein interaction networks, druggable proteins, and related drugs from user gene expression datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.