Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35356047›Full record

ArticleVessel plus2021

Comparison of outcome prediction models post-stroke for a population-based registry with clinical variables collected at admission

Kai-Cheng Hsu, Ching-Heng Lin, Kory R Johnson, Yang C Fann, Chung Y Hsu, Chon-Haw Tsai, Po-Lin Chen, Wei-Lun Chang, Po-Yen Yeh, Cheng-Yu Wei

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vessel plus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Kai-Cheng HsuSchool of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Ching-Heng LinCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Kory R JohnsonBioinformatics Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorder and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Yang C FannBioinformatics Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorder and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Chung Y HsuGraduate Institute of Biomedical Sciences, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chon-Haw TsaiDepartment of Neurology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Po-Lin ChenNeurological Institute, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Wei-Lun ChangDepartment of Neurology, Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua County, Taiwan.
Po-Yen YehDepartment of Neurology, St. Martin De Porres Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.
Cheng-Yu WeiDepartment of Neurology, Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua County, Taiwan.
China Medical University · TWChang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital · TWChang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWSt. Martin de Porres Hospital · TWTaichung Veterans General Hospital · TW

Funding

NINDS Office of the Clinical DirectorZIDNS003101 · NINDS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE · PI NATH, AVINDRA · 2009 to 2025
$219.6M
Intramural NIH HHS ZID NS003101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The ability to predict outcomes can help clinicians to better triage and treat stroke patients. We aimed to build prediction models using clinical data at admission and discharge to assess predictors highly relevant to stroke outcomes. Methods: A total of 37,094 patients from the Taiwan Stroke Registry (TSR) were enrolled to ascertain clinical variables and predict their mRS outcomes at 90 days. The performances (i.e., the area under the curves (AUCs)) of these independent predictors identified by logistic regression (LR) based on clinical variables were compared. Results: Several outcome prediction models based on different patient subgroups were evaluated, and their AUCs based on all clinical variables at admission and discharge were 0.85-0.88 and 0.92-0.96, respectively. After feature selections, the input features decreased from 140 to 2-18 (including age of onset and NIHSS at admission) and from 262 to 2-8 (including NIHSS at discharge and mRS at discharge) at admission and discharge, respectively. With only a few selected key clinical features, our models can provide better performance than those previously reported in the literature. Conclusion: This study proposed high performance prognostics outcome prediction models derived from a population-based nationwide stroke registry even with reduced LR-selected clinical features. These key clinical features can help physicians to better focus on stroke patients to triage for best outcome in acute settings.

Indexed as

logistic regressionmodified Rankin ScaleNational Institutes of Health Stroke Scalepopulation-based stroke registryStroke outcome

Identifiers

PMID35356047
PMCPMC8963213
OpenAlexW3124259594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.