Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35355940›Full record

ArticleGlobal pediatric health2022

Adverse Neonatal Outcomes and Associated Risk Factors: A Case-Control Study.

Yeneneh Ayalew Workineh, Hailemariam Mekonnen Workie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global pediatric health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. ESBL-producingEpidemiology and infection · 2025
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yeneneh Ayalew WorkinehBahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5268-8124
Hailemariam Mekonnen WorkieBahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adverse neonatal outcomes have a significant effect on perinatal and neonatal survival and the risk of developmental disabilities and illnesses throughout future lives. Hence, the objective of this study was to identify adverse neonatal outcomes and associated risk factors. Method: Institutional based unmatched case-control study was conducted among 206 neonates. Neonates who had adverse outcomes were cases with their index mothers and those neonates who hadn't had adverse outcomes were controls with their index mothers. Sociodemographic, potential neonatal risk factors, and clinical data were taken from the mothers and medical records. Data were entered into Epi Info v7 and analyzed using SPSS v23. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to adjust for confounding factors of adverse neonatal outcomes. Frequencies, means, standard deviations, percentages, and cross-tabulations were used to summarize the descriptive statistics of the data. Results: In this study, low birth weight (61.5%), preterm birth (57.7%), and low Apgar score at fifth minutes (53.9%) were the major identified adverse neonatal outcomes. Based on the multivariable logistic regression analysis, rural place of residence (AOR = 5.992 to 95% CI [1.011-35.809]), low monthly income (AOR = 4.364), middle monthly income (AOR = 4.364), and emergency cesarean section (AOR = 9.969) were the potential risk factors for adverse neonatal outcomes. Conclusions: The adverse neonatal outcomes & the risk factors identified in this research have the potential to harm the health of the neonates. Thus, it needs emphasis to tackle the problems and save the life of the newborn through better and strengthened ANC follow-up, accesses to health care.

Indexed as

adverse neonatal outcomeMekelle Cityneonaterisk factors

Identifiers

PMID35355940
PMCPMC8958707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.