ArticleChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu2022
Open surgery in the era of minimally invasive surgery.
Article in Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Learning curve of laparoscopic and robotic total gastrectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgery today · 2024Pooled it
- Development of a master-slave isomorphic modular handheld electric robotic prototype for laparoscopic surgery.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- The impact of prostate size on outcomes of aquablation: a prospective study.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- An international multicenter experience with the SenhanceJournal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Does minimally invasive pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (MI-PPPD) triumph over open pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (O-PPPD)? A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Minimally invasive surgery: a historical and legal perspective on technological transformation.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Comparative analysis of percutaneous and open approaches to traumatic spine injury: Analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
- Emerging molecules, tools, technology, and future of surgical knife in gastroenterology.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Intracorporeal vs. extracorporeal open and closed knot tying techniques in laparoscopy: A randomized, controlled study.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Epidemiology and early screening strategies for colorectal cancer in China.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2023Article
- The Beginner Laparoscopists Trends in the Learning Process of Laparoscopy for Adnexal Gynecological Pathologies-The Experience of Our Center.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The benefits and popularity of minimally invasive surgery are undeniable around the globe. However, open surgery is necessary and learning open surgery skills is still a necessity. Open surgery allows for better exposure to the surgical field and provides tactile sensation to facilitate the stereo visual assessment to precisely remove the lesion. Open surgery is still the key to surgical training, and the skills learned from open surgeries remain crucial for unforeseen circumstances and certain conditions like emergencies, challenge cases, or patients with compromised status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.