Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35355869›Full record

ArticleAccess microbiology2022

Prevalence and resistance pattern of uropathogens from community settings of different regions: an experience from India.

Sarita Mohapatra, Rajashree Panigrahy, Vibhor Tak, Shwetha J V, Sneha K C, Susmita Chaudhuri, Swati Pundir, Deepak Kocher, Hitender Gautam, Seema Sood and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Access microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile of Carbapenem ResistantJNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association · 2025
    Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sarita MohapatraDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8311-4112
Rajashree PanigrahyDepartment of Microbiology, SUM Hospital, Bhubaneswar, India.
Vibhor TakDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.
Shwetha J VDepartment of Microbiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7065-7759
Sneha K CDepartment of Microbiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7564-5773
Susmita ChaudhuriTranslational Health Science and Technology Institute, Faridabad, India.
Swati PundirDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Deepak KocherDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9942-9338
Hitender GautamDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Seema SoodDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8797-5286
Bimal Kumar DasDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Arti KapilDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Pankaj HariDepartment of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Arvind KumarDepartment of Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9229-1081
Rajesh KumariDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Mani KalaivaniDepartment of Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ambica RDepartment of Microbiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Karnataka, India.
Harshal Ramesh SalveCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sumit MalhotraCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4979-5700
Shashi KantCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · INBangalore Medical College and Research Institute · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur · INInstitute of Medical Sciences and Sum Hospital · INTranslational Health Science and Technology Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common infections in clinical practice worldwide in both healthcare and community settings causing significant morbidity and mortality. It is one of the major conditions at the community level treated empirically and regarded as a potential cause of emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Limited information is available regarding community-acquired UTI (CA-UTI) from India. Methodology: This is a first of its kind, multicentric-cross-sectional study at the community level targeting patients attending the out-patient department (OPD) of the community health centre (CHC) from four geographical regions (North, South, West and East) of India. The study had been designed to determine the epidemiology, antibiogram profile and identification of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producer and carbapenem resistant (CR) uropathogens. Samples were collected prospectively from UTI suspected patients coming at CHC and processed at the tertiary healthcare centres using a common standard operating procedure. Clinical history of all the patients exhibiting significant bacteriuria was collected and data was analysed. Result: Overall, 250 out of a total of 2459 (10.1 %) urine samples were positive for bacteria with significant bacteriuria (adult: paediatrics, 6.7 : 1). Females were predominantly affected (male: female, 1 : 2.9). History of recent episode of UTI was observed as the commonest risk factor followed by diabetes mellitus. Altogether, 86 % of total cases were caused by Conclusion: The current study highlights the increasing incidence of AMR among uropathogens at the community-settings of India. A significant percentage of ESBL producers among the isolated UPEC and

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistancecommunity-acquired urinary tract infectionIndiaKlebsiella pneumoniaeurinary tract infectionuropathogenic E. coli

Identifiers

PMID35355869
PMCPMC8941965
OpenAlexW4210881180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.