ArticleCureus2022
An Evaluation of the Predictive Value of Sepsis Patient Evaluation in the Emergency Department (SPEED) Score in Estimating 28-Day Mortality Among Patients With Sepsis Presenting to the Emergency Department: A Prospective Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Sepsis is a life-threatening medical emergency and a significant cause of mortality. Risk stratification scores for sepsis can be unsuitable for use in the emergency department (ED) due to their complexity, and an appropriate solution has yet to be found. In this study, the predictive value of the Sepsis Patient Evaluation in the Emergency Department (SPEED) score in estimating 28-day mortality was assessed among patients with sepsis presenting to the ED, in order to determine its suitability as an efficient risk stratification system. Materials and methods This was a single-center, prospective observational study conducted at an urban tertiary care center. We included patients presenting to the ED with suspected or confirmed sepsis who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of our study. The patients were evaluated with the following scoring systems on arrival: the SPEED score; Predisposition, Infection, Response, and Organ dysfunction (PIRO) score; and Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score; the patients were subsequently followed up on the 28th day to record the final outcomes with regard to mortality and discharge rates. Results This study included 127 patients in total. The median age of the study population was 49 years, and the 28-day mortality rate was 50.4%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve for the SPEED score for predicting mortality was 0.899 (95% CI: 0.847-0.951). In comparison, the AUROC for MEDS and PIRO scores was 0.857 (95% CI: 0.793-0.92) and 0.895 (95% CI: 0.838-0.951), respectively. Based on the DeLong test, no significant difference was found in the diagnostic performances with respect to these scores. Conclusion The SPEED score is a simple and handy parameter that can be used for the early and appropriate risk stratification of patients with sepsis in the ED.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.