Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35355430›Full record

ArticleCPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology2022

Exposure-response analyses for selection/confirmation of optimal isatuximab dosing regimen in combination with pomalidomide/dexamethasone treatment in patients with multiple myeloma.

Fatiha Rachedi, Kimiko Koiwai, Nadia Gaudel-Dedieu, Bernard Sebastien, Hoai-Thu Thai, Claire Brillac, Jean Baptiste Fau, Laurent Nguyen, Helgi van de Velde, Christine Veyrat-Follet and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fatiha RachediSanofi, Data and Data Science, on behalf of IviData Life Sciences, Paris, France.
Kimiko KoiwaiSanofi, Translational Medicine and Early Development, Paris, France.
Nadia Gaudel-DedieuSanofi, Clinical Modelling and Evidence Integration, Data and Data Science, Paris, France.
Bernard SebastienSanofi, Clinical Modelling and Evidence Integration, Data and Data Science, Paris, France.
Hoai-Thu ThaiSanofi, Clinical Modelling and Evidence Integration, Data and Data Science, Paris, France.
Claire BrillacSanofi, Translational Medicine and Early Development, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1743-3211
Jean Baptiste FauSanofi, Translational Medicine and Early Development, Paris, France.
Laurent NguyenSanofi, Translational Medicine and Early Development, Paris, France.
Helgi van de VeldeSanofi, Oncology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Christine Veyrat-FolletSanofi, Clinical Modelling and Evidence Integration, Data and Data Science, Paris, France.
Dorothée SemiondSanofi, Translational Medicine and Early Development, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Sanofi (France) · FRAVEO Oncology (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isatuximab is an approved anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody with multiple antitumor modes of action. An exposure-response (E-R) analysis using data from patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) enrolled in a phase Ib clinical study who received isatuximab at doses from 5 to 20 mg/kg weekly for 1 cycle (4 weeks) followed by every 2 weeks thereafter (qw/q2w) in combination with pomalidomide/dexamethasone (n = 44) was first used to determine the optimal dose/schedule for the phase III ICARIA-MM study. It was complemented by an E-R analysis from a second phase Ib study of patients who received isatuximab at doses from 3 to 10 mg/kg q2w or 10 or 20 mg/kg qw/q2w in combination with lenalidomide/dexamethasone (n = 52). Plasma trough concentration at week 4 (CT4W) was the best predictor for response, and the benefit of the initial 4-weekly administration was confirmed. Although the predicted overall response rate (ORR) was higher at 20 mg/kg vs. 10 mg/kg, the 95% confidence intervals were overlapping. Considering the high probability of success to reach the targeted ORR of greater than or equal to 60%, 10 mg/kg qw/q2w was selected. Results of the E-R analysis from the lenalidomide/dexamethasone study and published disease modeling using data from both phase Ib clinical studies reinforced 10 mg/kg qw/q2w as the optimal dose/schedule for the phase III ICARIA-MM study. E-R analysis showed that higher CT4W was associated with higher ORR. Developed models supported the phase III isatuximab dosing regimen selection/confirmation of 10 mg/kg qw/q2w for use in combination with pomalidomide/dexamethasone in patients with RRMM.

Indexed as

Multiple MyelomaAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDexamethasoneHumansLenalidomideNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalThalidomideAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDexamethasoneisatuximabLenalidomidepomalidomideThalidomide

Identifiers

PMID35355430
PMCPMC9197531
OpenAlexW4220880289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.