Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35355379›Full record

Observational studyNutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia2022

Exploring the diets of mothers and their partners during pregnancy: Findings from the Queensland Family Cohort pilot study.

Shelley A Wilkinson, Danielle A J M Schoenaker, Susan de Jersey, Clare E Collins, Linda Gallo, Megan Rollo, Danielle Borg, Marloes Dekker Nitert, Helen Truby, Helen L Barrett and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Exploring the diets of mothers and their partners during pregnancy: Findings from the Queensland Family Cohort pilot study.Nutrition & dietetics : the journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia · 2022
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Shelley A WilkinsonFaculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, School of Human Movements and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland.ORCID 0000-0003-3365-3473
Danielle A J M SchoenakerFaculty of Medicine, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Susan de JerseyFaculty of Medicine, Centre for Clinical Research and Perinatal Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Clare E CollinsSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Linda GalloSchool of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Megan RolloPriority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Danielle BorgQueensland Family Cohort, Mater Research Institute, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Marloes Dekker NitertSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Helen TrubyFaculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, School of Human Movements and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland.ORCID 0000-0002-1992-1649
Helen L BarrettDepartment of Endocrinology, Mater Health, South Brisbane, Australia; Mater Research Institute, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Sailesh KumarMater Centre for Maternal Fetal Medicine, Mater Mothers Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Vicki CliftonMater Research Institute, The University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AUMater Health Services · AUUniversity of Wollongong · AU

Funding

Department of Health IS-BRC-1215-20004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimModifiable behaviours during the first 1000 days of life influence developmental trajectories of adult chronic diseases. Despite this, sub-optimal dietary intakes during pregnancy and excessive gestational weight gain are common. Very little is known about partners' dietary patterns and the influence on women's pregnancy dietary patterns. We aimed to examine dietary intake during pregnancy among women and their partners, and gestational weight gain patterns in the Queensland Family Cohort pilot study.

methodsThe Queensland Family Cohort is a prospective, observational study piloted at a Brisbane (Australia) tertiary maternity hospital from 2018 to 2021. Participant characteristics, weight gain, dietary and nutrient intake were assessed.

resultsData were available for 194 pregnant women and their partners. Poor alignment with Australian Guide to Healthy Eating recommendations was observed. Highest alignment was for fruit (40% women) and meat/alternatives (38% partners) and lowest for breads/cereals (<1% women) and milk/alternatives (13% partners). Fewer women (4.4%-60.3%) than their partners (5.4%-92.3%) met guidelines for all micronutrient intakes from food alone, particularly folic acid, iodine, and iron. Women were more likely to meet daily recommendations for fruit, vegetables, dairy, bread/cereals, and meat/alternatives when their partners also met recommendations. Women with a higher pre-pregnancy body mass index were more likely to gain above recommended weight gain ranges.

conclusionsIn this contemporary cohort of pregnant women and their partners, sub-optimal dietary patterns and deficits in some nutrients were common. There is an urgent need for evidence-informed public health policy and programs to improve diet quality during pregnancy due to intergenerational effects.

Indexed as

Gestational Weight GainMothersAdultAustraliaDietEdible GrainFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsPregnancyProspective StudiesQueenslandWeight Gainbirth cohortdietary guidelinesdietary intakegestational weight gainmaternal healthpregnancy

Identifiers

PMID35355379
PMCPMC9790493
OpenAlexW4221063141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.