Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35355359›Full record

ArticleHealth & social care in the community2022

Conceptualisation of health inequalities by local healthcare systems: A document analysis.

Jasmine N Olivera, John Ford, Sarah Sowden, Clare Bambra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & social care in the community, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Non-pharmaceutical primary care interventions to improve mental health in deprived populations: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Using data to improve the health of coastal communities: The Coda Network.International journal of population data science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Health inequality: Time to get smart about our language.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  12. A Crisis in the Health System and Quality of Healthcare in Economically Developed Countries.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jasmine N OliveraDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Jesus College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
John FordDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Sarah SowdenPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Clare BambraPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Funding

Department of Health CA-CL-2018-04-ST2-010Department of Health NIHR200173Medical Research Council MR/K02325X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2019, local healthcare systems in England were asked to develop formal plans to reduce health inequalities. Here, we explore plans to understand how local healthcare systems conceptualise health inequalities and why. A broad Internet search and targeted search of NHS websites were conducted to identify all publicly accessible healthcare planning documents (National Health Service (NHS) Long-Term Plan (LTP) response documents) produced by local health partnerships in England. A thematic document analysis of the accessible plans was undertaken in NVivo by coding text relating to health inequalities. Of the 44 documents developed, 13 were publicly accessible. These 13 local plans were submitted to NHS England for review between September 2019 and January 2020 and averaged 167 pages (range: 41-273 pages). Only one document contained a chapter dedicated to health inequalities. After analysis, five themes were identified: (1) variation and (2) vagueness explained how health inequalities were conceptualised and (3) use of value judgements, (4) lack of prior conceptualisation and approach and (5) a lack of commitment to action in the documents to reduce health inequalities explained what led to the overall vagueness and variation. Local healthcare systems were found to conceptualise health inequalities in a vague and varying manner, and their conceptualisations did not reflect established health inequalities frameworks. A clear conceptual national framework for addressing health inequalities is needed to support local healthcare systems, so they can address health inequalities meaningfully and sustainably.

Indexed as

Concept FormationState MedicineDelivery of Health CareDocument AnalysisEnglandHumansaccess and evaluationhealthcarehealth inequalitieshealth policyinequalities in health and healthcarepatient care managementpublic health systems’ researchquality

Identifiers

PMID35355359
PMCPMC10084138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.