Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35355333›Full record

Trial reportJournal of traumatic stress2022

Attention-control training as an early intervention for veterans leaving the military: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

Olivia Metcalf, Meaghan L O'Donnell, David Forbes, Yair Bar-Haim, Stephanie Hodson, Richard A Bryant, Alexander C McFarlane, David Morton, Loretta Poerio, Reut Naim and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of traumatic stress, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A Scoping Review of Interventions Targeting the Mental Health of Australian Veterans.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Olivia MetcalfDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9570-8463
Meaghan L O'DonnellDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4349-0022
David ForbesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Yair Bar-HaimSchool of Psychological Sciences and Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Stephanie HodsonDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Canberra, Australia.
Richard A BryantSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Alexander C McFarlaneDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
David MortonDepartment of Defence, Canberra, Australia.
Loretta PoerioDepartment of Veterans Affairs, Canberra, Australia.
Reut NaimEmotion and Development Branch, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA.
Tracey VarkerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7139-062X
The University of Melbourne · AUDepartment of Foreign Affairs and Trade · AUNational Institutes of Health · USTel Aviv University · ILUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transitioning out of the military can be a time of change and challenge. Research indicates that altered threat monitoring in military populations may contribute to the development of psychopathology in veterans, and interventions that adjust threat monitoring in personnel leaving the military may be beneficial. Australian Defence Force personnel (N = 59) transitioning from the military were randomized to receive four weekly sessions of either attention-control training or a placebo attention training. The primary outcome was symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), as measured using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) at posttreatment. Following training, participants who received attention-control training reported significantly lower levels of PTSD symptoms, Hedges' g = 0.86, 95% CI [0.37, 1.36], p = .004, and significantly improved work and social functioning, Hedges' g = 0.93, 95% CI [0.46, 1.39], p = .001, relative to those in the placebo condition. Moreover, no participants who received attention-control training worsened with regard to PTSD symptoms, whereas 23.8% of those who received the placebo attention training experienced an increase in PTSD symptoms. The preliminary findings from this pilot study add to a small body of evidence supporting attention-control training as a viable indicated early intervention approach for PTSD that is worthy of further research.

Indexed as

Military PersonnelStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticVeteransAttentionAustraliaHumansPilot ProjectsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35355333
PMCPMC9541701
OpenAlexW4221079835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.