Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35355300›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of caring sciences2022

The measurement of compassionate leadership: Adaptation and Spanish validation of the compassionate leadership self-reported scale.

Noemí Sansó, Juan P Leiva, Gabriel Vidal-Blanco, Laura Galiana, Michael West

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Noemí SansóDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University of the Balearic Islands, Mallorca, Spain.
Juan P LeivaSupport and Palliative Care Team, Hospital Manacor, Mallorca, Spain.
Gabriel Vidal-BlancoDepartment of Nursing, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Laura GalianaDepartment of Methodology for the Behavioral Sciences, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5342-5251
Michael WestThe King's Fund, London, UK.

Funding

FEDER/Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación - Agencia Estatal de Investigación, Spain
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA culture of shared leadership is widespread among palliative care teams based on a commitment to valuing and including all people equally. As compassion is a core value for end-of-life care work, compassionate leadership may be the best way to lead in palliative care.

aimsThe aims of this study were twofold: (1) to adapt and validate the Compassionate Leadership Self-reported Scale in a sample of palliative care professionals; and (2) to study the relation between compassionate leadership and associated concepts of self-compassion, awareness and self-care.

methodsA cross-sectional survey of 296 Spanish end-of-life care professionals was conducted. Analyses included descriptive statistics, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with four-correlated factors, reliability estimates and a structural model.

resultsResults suggested there were medium to high levels of compassionate leadership in the sample. The CFA showed an adequate overall fit: χ

conclusionThe Compassionate Leadership Scale has adequate psychometric properties when used to assess compassionate leadership in the context of end-of-life care. Our results indicate that self-compassion, awareness and self-care are important correlates of such compassionate leadership.

Indexed as

EmpathyLeadershipCross-Sectional StudiesHumansReproducibility of ResultsSelf Reportawarenesscompassionate leadershippalliative careself-careself-compassion

Identifiers

PMID35355300
PMCPMC9790542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.