Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35355174›Full record

SynthesisJournal of autism and developmental disorders2023

Eye-Tracking Studies in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Imanol Setien-Ramos, Jorge Lugo-Marín, Laura Gisbert-Gustemps, Emiliano Díez-Villoria, María Magán-Maganto, Ricardo Canal-Bedia, Josep Antoni Ramos-Quiroga

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Imanol Setien-Ramos *Psychiatric Genetics Unit, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Jorge Lugo-Marín *Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. jlugo@vhebron.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3710-0294
Laura Gisbert-GustempsDepartment of Psychiatry, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Emiliano Díez-VilloriaCentro de Atención Integral al Autismo-InFoAutismo. INICO-Instituto Universitario de Integración en la Comunidad, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
María Magán-MagantoCentro de Atención Integral al Autismo-InFoAutismo. INICO-Instituto Universitario de Integración en la Comunidad, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Ricardo Canal-BediaCentro de Atención Integral al Autismo-InFoAutismo. INICO-Instituto Universitario de Integración en la Comunidad, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Josep Antoni Ramos-QuirogaPsychiatric Genetics Unit, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Universidad de Salamanca · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental · ESVall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eye-tracking studies have shown potential in effectively discriminating between autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and non-ASD groups. The main objective of the present study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of eye-tracking studies in adults with ASD. A total of 22 studies were included for meta-analysis. Eyes and Non-Social regions proved better for discriminating between ASD and non-ASD adults, while fixation duration seems to be the outcome to choose. Active engaged tasks seem to reduce differences between ASD and non-ASD adults, regardless of the emotional content of the stimuli/task. Proportional fixation duration on eyes and non-social areas in non-active tasks (e.g. free viewing) seems to be the best eye-tracking design for increasing the sensitivity and specificity in ASD adults.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAdultEmotionsEye-Tracking TechnologyHumansPhotic StimulationSensitivity and SpecificityAdultsAutism spectrum disorderEye-trackingMeta-analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35355174
OpenAlexW4220726161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.