Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35355173›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2022

Surgical Treatment for Choledocholithiasis Following Repeated Failed Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.

Muhammad Younis, Niv Pencovich, Reut El-On, Nir Lubezky, Yaacov Goykhman, Adam Phillips, Ido Nachmany

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Muhammad YounisDivision of General Surgery, Department of General Surgery B, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, The Nikolas & Elizabeth Shlezak Fund for Experimental Surgery, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Niv PencovichDepartment of General Surgery and Transplantation, Sheba Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Hashomer, 52621, Ramat-Gan, Israel. niv.pencovich1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0049-0295
Reut El-OnDivision of General Surgery, Department of General Surgery B, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, The Nikolas & Elizabeth Shlezak Fund for Experimental Surgery, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Nir LubezkyDivision of General Surgery, Department of General Surgery B, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, The Nikolas & Elizabeth Shlezak Fund for Experimental Surgery, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Yaacov GoykhmanDivision of General Surgery, Department of General Surgery B, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, The Nikolas & Elizabeth Shlezak Fund for Experimental Surgery, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Adam PhillipsDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, The Nikolas & Elizabeth Shlezak Fund for Experimental Surgery, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ido NachmanyDepartment of General Surgery and Transplantation, Sheba Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Hashomer, 52621, Ramat-Gan, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the first line treatment for choledocholithiasis. In many occasions, several attempts of ERCP are performed until failure is declared and surgical treatment is applied, in many times following procedure-related complications. We present the results of surgical management of patients with choledocholithiasis following repeated failures of ERCP due to impaction of multiple large stones.

methodsPatients that underwent surgical treatment for choledocholithiasis following repeated ERCP attempts between January 2006 and December 2018 were retrospectively assessed. Post-ERCP complications were evaluated and the surgical approach, technique, and outcomes were assessed.

resultsOne hundred and two patients were operated on for choledocholithiasis following repeated failed ERCP. All the patients had at least 2 failed attempts (mean = 3.2 ± 1.7), and 25 (23.5%) suffered major ERCP-related complications. Following choledochotomy and stone extraction, bilioenteric anastomosis was done in the vast majority of patients (90.2%), most commonly choledochoduodenostomy (62%). Thirty-eight (37%) patients had minimally invasive procedure (laparoscopic n = 26, robotic assisted n = 12). Major post-operative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) occurred in 24 patients (23.5%). Nine patients (8.8%) were re-operated and 10 (9.8%) were readmitted within 30 days from surgery. Three patients died within 30 days from surgery. Older patients had significantly more ERCP attempts and suffered higher post-operative mortality. During a median follow-up of 70 months, the only biliary complication was an anastomotic stricture in one patient.

conclusionSurgery for CBDS after failure of ERCP is safe and provides a highly effective long-term solution.

Indexed as

CholedocholithiasisLaparoscopyCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholedochostomyHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBile ductCholedochoduodenostomyCholedochotomyHepaticojejunostomyT-tube

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.