Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35355155›Full record

ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2022

Development of a prognostic metabolic signature in stomach adenocarcinoma.

Yu Gong, Siyuan Wu, Sen Dong, Shuai Chen, Gengdi Cai, Kun Bao, Haojun Yang, Yuwen Jiao

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yu GongDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 68 GeHu Road, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China.
Siyuan WuDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, The Affiliated Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213000, China.
Sen DongBengbu Medical University, Benbu, 233000, China.
Shuai ChenNanjing Medical University, Jiangsu, 213000, China.
Gengdi CaiDalian Medical University, Dalian, 116000, China.
Kun BaoDalian Medical University, Dalian, 116000, China.
Haojun YangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 68 GeHu Road, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China.
Yuwen JiaoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Changzhou No.2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 68 GeHu Road, Changzhou, 213000, Jiangsu, China. drjiaoyuwen@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9417-4279

Funding

Changzhou Sci&Tech CJ20200097Young Science & Technology Project of Changzhou Health Commission QN202033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe growth and aggressiveness of Stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) is significantly affected by basic metabolic changes. This study aimed to identify metabolic gene prognostic signatures in STAD.

methodsAn integrative analysis of datasets from the Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus was performed. A metabolic gene prognostic signature was developed using univariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. A nomogram model was developed to predict the prognosis of STAD patients. Finally, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GESA) was used to explore the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways significantly associated with the risk grouping.

resultsA total of 327 metabolism-related differentially expressed genes were identified. Three subtypes of STAD were identified and nine immune cell types, including memory B cell, resting and activated CD4+ memory T cells, were significantly different among the three subgroups. A risk score model including nine survival-related genes which could separate high-risk patients from low-risk patients was developed. The prognosis of STAD patients likely benefited from lower expression levels of genes, including ABCG4, ABCA6, GPX8, KYNU, ST8SIA5, and CYP19A1. Age, radiation therapy, tumor recurrence, and risk score model status were found to be independent risk factors for STAD and were used for developing a nomogram. Nine KEGG pathways, including spliceosome, pentose phosphate pathway, and citrate TCA cycle were significantly enriched in GESA.

conclusionWe propose a metabolic gene signature and a nomogram for STAD which might be used for predicting the survival of STAD patients and exploring prognostic markers.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaStomach NeoplasmsHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPrognosisMetabolic prognostic signaturesPrognostic predictionStomach adenocarcinoma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.