ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2022
Evaluation of different management scenarios for trout farm effluents using dynamic water quality modeling.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Trout farm effluents are among the important sources of water pollution by nutrients, organics, and suspended solids. This research study was conducted to investigate and manage the impacts of trout farm effluents on Esen Stream water quality, which is located at the southwest of Turkey. A water quality monitoring program was conducted for a period of 1 year at 21 stations to determine river hydraulics and water quality characteristics. Monthly water quality analyses were conducted for inflow and outflow of a number of selected farms to determine their characteristics and contribution to water pollution. About 1460 t of suspended solids, 230 t of nitrogen, and 46 t of phosphorus were annually discharged into Esen Stream from the farms. A dynamic water quality simulation model developed by the US-Environmental Protection Agency, WASP8, was applied to Esen Stream to predict and manage pollution from trout farms and the tributaries. The calibrated and verified model was used to evaluate the impacts of different management scenarios on stream water quality. Solid removal with a rotating micro-screen, establishment of a partially recirculated system and increasing production capacities of farms were among the simulated scenarios. The best management practice was the combined application of solids removal and reuse of treated farm effluents in a partially recirculated system, which provided significant improvements in the receiving stream water quality. This study showed that dynamic water quality models are powerful tools for basin-scale management of land-based aquaculture for capacity planning, assimilation capacity estimation, sustainable operation, and environmental impact assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.