Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35355067›Full record

SynthesisThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2022

A systematic review of the effect of therapeutic drug monitoring on patient health outcomes during treatment with penicillins.

Timothy Luxton, Natalie King, Christoph Wälti, Lars Jeuken, Jonathan Sandoe

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Impact of therapeutic drug monitoring of antibiotics in the management of infective endocarditis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Timothy LuxtonSchool of Biomedical Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0772-5384
Natalie KingLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Christoph WältiSchool of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Lars JeukenLeeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Jonathan SandoeSchool of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0193-8677
University of Leeds · GBLeiden University · NL

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N029976/1University of Leeds
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDosing regimens guided by therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may be able to improve penicillin exposure in patients, which could result in improved patient health outcomes.

objectivesThis systematic review aims to describe the impact penicillin TDM has on health outcomes, including antimicrobial resistance (AMR).

methodsStudies measuring penicillins in patient samples that adjusted regimens according to the result, and reported health outcomes were selected. Study bias was assessed according to study type. Included study characteristics were tabulated and described by narrative synthesis.

resultsThree randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 16 cohort studies, and 9 case studies were included. No RCTs showed statistically significant improvements in health outcomes. Five cohort studies showed improvement in at least one health outcome associated with target attainment. However, there was a high risk of bias in all studies for health outcomes. One study assessed the impact of penicillin TDM on AMR and found that improved target attainment was associated with suppression of resistance. No studies found a detrimental effect of penicillin TDM.

conclusionsThere is little evidence to suggest that TDM improves health outcomes, however neither health outcomes nor impact on AMR were adequately addressed. Variations in TDM implementation meant that a meta-analysis was not suitable. Penicillin TDM needs standardization, however there is currently no clear evidence of optimal conditions. Suitably powered studies are required to resolve the ambiguity surrounding the impact of TDM on clinical outcomes, including AMR. Further, standardized protocols and concentration targets need to be identified for TDM to be implemented successfully.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringPenicillinsHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePenicillins

Identifiers

PMID35355067
PMCPMC9155611
OpenAlexW4220971800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.