ArticleEssays in biochemistry2022
Uptake of formative feedback: perspective from a transnational education cohort.
Article in Essays in biochemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A special issue of Essays in Biochemistry on current educational developments in molecular bioscience.Essays in biochemistry · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An important aspect of teaching and learning is the student's response to and enaction of formative feedback. Few studies have examined how students interpret the formative feedback provided by tutors and translate these into action. In order to understand this better, we carried out a retrospective analysis of student responses to iterative formative feedback. The context of the present study is an extracurricular project where undergraduate biomedical science students on a transnational education programme competed in an extracurricular, cross-disciplinary video competition. Based on detailed analysis of provided feedback and subsequent enaction of the feedback, we found that students were active participants in the feedback process, engaged with the meaningful feedback critically, and incorporated the relevant changes to improve the final output. In this article, we will give our perspectives on how students understand, process and act on feedback, and also examine the features of the feedback that elicited these responses from students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35355056What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.