Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35354902›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Comparison of MRI T1, T2, and T2* mapping with histology for assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration in an ovine model.

Nora Bouhsina, Cyrille Decante, Jean-Baptiste Hardel, Dominique Rouleau, Jérôme Abadie, Antoine Hamel, Catherine Le Visage, Julie Lesoeur, Jérôme Guicheux, Johann Clouet and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Ovine models of intervertebral disc degeneration.Annals of translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nora BouhsinaINSERM, UMRS 1229, Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton (RMeS), Université de Nantes, ONIRIS, 44042, Nantes, France.
Cyrille DecanteINSERM, UMRS 1229, Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton (RMeS), Université de Nantes, ONIRIS, 44042, Nantes, France.
Jean-Baptiste HardelDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, CRIP, ONIRIS, College of Veterinary Medicine, Food Science and Engineering, 44307, Nantes, France.
Dominique RouleauINSERM, UMRS 1229, Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton (RMeS), Université de Nantes, ONIRIS, 44042, Nantes, France.
Jérôme AbadieLaboniris, ONIRIS, College of Veterinary Medicine, Food Science and Engineering, 44307, Nantes, France.
Antoine HamelINSERM, UMRS 1229, Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton (RMeS), Université de Nantes, ONIRIS, 44042, Nantes, France.
Catherine Le VisageINSERM, UMRS 1229, Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton (RMeS), Université de Nantes, ONIRIS, 44042, Nantes, France.
Julie LesoeurINSERM, UMRS 1229, Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton (RMeS), Université de Nantes, ONIRIS, 44042, Nantes, France.
Jérôme GuicheuxINSERM, UMRS 1229, Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton (RMeS), Université de Nantes, ONIRIS, 44042, Nantes, France. jerome.guicheux@inserm.fr.
Johann ClouetINSERM, UMRS 1229, Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton (RMeS), Université de Nantes, ONIRIS, 44042, Nantes, France.
Marion FusellierINSERM, UMRS 1229, Regenerative Medicine and Skeleton (RMeS), Université de Nantes, ONIRIS, 44042, Nantes, France.
Inserm · FRNantes Université · FROniris · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An easy, reliable, and time-efficient standardized approach for assessing lumbar intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration with relaxation times measurements in pre-clinical and clinical studies is lacking. This prospective study aims to determine the most appropriate method for lumbar IVD degeneration (IDD) assessment in sheep by comparing three quantitative MRI sequences (variable-flip-angle T1 mapping, and multi-echo T2 and T2* mapping), correlating them with Pfirrmann grading and histology. Strong intra- and interrater agreements were found for Nucleus pulposus (NP) regions-of-interest (ROI). T1, T2, and T2* mapping correlated with Pfirrmann grading and histological scoring (p < 0.05) except for the most ventral rectangular ROI on T2 maps. Correlations were excellent for all of the T1 ROIs and the T2* NP ROIs. Highly significant differences in T1 values were found between all Pfirrmann grades except between grades I/II and between grades III/IV. Significant differences were identified in the T2 and the T2* values between all grades except between grades I/III. T1, T2, and T2* relaxation times measurements of the NP are an accurate and time-efficient tool to assess lumbar IDD in sheep. Variable-flip-angle T1 mapping may be further considered as a valuable method to investigate IDD and to assess the efficacy of regenerative treatments in longitudinal studies.

Indexed as

Intervertebral Disc DegenerationAnimalsHistological TechniquesMagnetic Resonance ImagingProspective StudiesRecordsSheep

Identifiers

PMID35354902
PMCPMC8967912
OpenAlexW4220683660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.