Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35354712›Full record

ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2022

A Nationwide Questionnaire Survey on Awake Craniotomy in Japan.

Masayoshi Kawata, Ayaka Fukui, Yohei Mineharu, Takayuki Kikuchi, Yukihiro Yamao, Etsuko Yamamoto Hattori, Atsuko Shiraki, Toshiyuki Mizota, Keiko Furukawa, Susumu Miyamoto and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Masayoshi KawataDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital.
Ayaka FukuiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital.
Yohei MineharuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine.
Takayuki KikuchiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine.
Yukihiro YamaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine.
Etsuko Yamamoto HattoriDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine.
Atsuko ShirakiDepartment of Anesthesia, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine.
Toshiyuki MizotaDepartment of Anesthesia, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine.
Keiko FurukawaCancer Center, Kyoto University Hospital.
Susumu MiyamotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine.
Atsushi YonezawaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Kyoto University Hospital.
Yoshiki ArakawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of awake craniotomies is increasing because of its beneficial features. However, not enough information is available regarding the current status of awake craniotomy in Japan. To evaluate the current status of awake craniotomy in institutes, a nationwide questionnaire survey was conducted. From June to August 2019, we conducted a questionnaire survey on awake craniotomy in the neurosurgery department of 45 institutes that perform awake craniotomies in Japan. Responses were obtained from 39 institutes (response rate, 86.7%). The main methods of awake craniotomy were almost the same in all institutes. Twenty-six institutes (66.7%) had fewer than 10 awake craniotomies (low-volume institutes) per year, and 13 high-volume institutes (33.3%) performed more than 10 awake craniotomies annually. Some institutes experienced a relatively high frequency of adverse events. In 11 institutes (28.2%), the frequency of intraoperative seizures was more than 10%. An intraoperative seizure frequency of 1%-9%, 10%-29%, and over 30% was identified in 12 (92%), 0 (0%), and 1 (8%) of the high-volume institutes, which was significantly less than in 16 (62%), 10 (38%), and 0 (0%) of the low-volume institutes (p = 0.0059). The routine usage of preoperative antiepileptic drugs was not different between them, but the old type was used more often in the low-volume institutes (p = 0.0022). Taken together, the annual number of awake craniotomies was less than 10 in over two-thirds of the institutes. Fewer intraoperative seizures were reported in the high-volume institutes, which tend not to preoperatively use the old type of antiepileptic drugs.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsWakefulnessAnticonvulsantsCraniotomyHumansJapanSeizuresSurveys and QuestionnairesAnticonvulsantsawake craniotomybrain tumorintraoperative seizuresJapanquestionnaire investigation

Identifiers

PMID35354712
PMCPMC9259085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.