Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35354626›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

REducing Colonoscopies in patients without significant bowEl DiseasE: the RECEDE Study - protocol for a prospective diagnostic accuracy study.

Christopher Bradley, Siew Wan Hee, Lazaros Andronis, Krishna Persaud, Mark A Hull, John Todd, Sian Taylor-Phillips, Steve Smith, Rachel Constable, Norman Waugh and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04516785 (Reducing Colonoscopies in Patients Without Significant Bowel Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04516785 completednot on this map

Reducing Colonoscopies in Patients Without Significant Bowel Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS TrustRan2020 to 2022Enrolled1,181ConditionsColorectal Cancer, Colorectal Disorders, Colorectal Adenoma, Colorectal PolypArmsFIT and VOC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher BradleyResearch & Development, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK Christopher.Bradley@uhcw.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-6905-1768
Siew Wan HeeWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Lazaros AndronisWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Krishna PersaudDepartment of Chemical Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Mark A HullSchool of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
John ToddResearch & Development, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Sian Taylor-PhillipsWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1841-4346
Steve SmithResearch & Development, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3468-7483
Rachel ConstableResearch & Development, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
Norman WaughWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Ramesh P ArasaradnamResearch & Development, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK.
RECEDE Study Group
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Warwick · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDemand for colonoscopies and CT colonography (CTC) is exceeding capacity in National Health Service Trusts. In many patients colonoscopies and CTCs show no significant bowel disease (SBD). Faecal Immunochemical Testing (FIT) is being introduced to prioritise patients for colonoscopies but is insufficient to identify non-SBD patients meaning colonoscopy and CTC demand remains high. The REducing Colonoscopies in patients without significant bowEl DiseasE (RECEDE) study aims to test urine volatile organic compound (VOC) analysis alongside FIT to improve detection of SBD and to reduce the number of colonoscopies and CTCs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, prospective diagnostic accuracy study evaluating whether stool FIT plus urine VOC compared with stool FIT alone improves detection of SBD in patients referred for colonoscopy or CTC due to persistent lower gastrointestinal symptoms. To ensure SBD is not missed, the dual test requires a high sensitivity, set at 97% with 95% CI width of 5%. Our assumption is that to achieve this sensitivity requires 200 participants with SBD. Further assuming 19% of all participants will have SBD and 55% of all participants will return both stool and urine samples we will recruit 1915 participants. The thresholds for FIT and VOC results diagnosing SBD have been pre-set. If either FIT or VOC exceeds the respective threshold, the participant will be classed as having suspected SBD. As an exploratory analysis we will be testing different thresholds. The reference comparator will be a complete colonoscopy or CTC. Secondary outcomes will look at optimising the FIT and VOC thresholds for SBD detection. An economic evaluation, using a denovo decision analytic model, will be carried out determine the costs, benefits and overall cost-effectiveness of FIT +VOC vs FIT followed by colonoscopy. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained by Liverpool Central Research Ethics Committee (20/NW/0346). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: RECEDE is registered on Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04516785 & ISRCTN14982373. This protocol was written and published before results of the trial were available.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyState MedicineHumansOccult BloodProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityColorectal surgeryComputed tomographyEndoscopy

Identifiers

PMID35354626
PMCPMC8968545
OpenAlexW4221116220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.