ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2022
Association of computed tomography screening with lung cancer stage shift and survival in the United States: quasi-experimental study.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06963515 (Cutting-edge IMAGING Technologies to Improve the SAFEty and the Sustainability of LUNG Cancer Screening and the Accuracy of Non-invasive Lung Nodules Characterization), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cutting-edge IMAGING Technologies to Improve the SAFEty and the Sustainability of LUNG Cancer Screening and the Accuracy of Non-invasive Lung Nodules Characterization
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.
- ESR Essentials: lung cancer screening with low-dose CT-practice recommendations by the European Society of Thoracic Imaging.European radiology · 2026Guideline
- Lung cancer screening with low-dose CT: definition of positive, indeterminate, and negative screen results. A nodule management recommendation from the European Society of Thoracic Imaging.European radiology · 2026Guideline
- Assessing the clinical, humanistic, and economic impact of early cancer diagnosis: a systematic literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of perioperative outcomes with or without routine chest tube drainage after video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of a single breath-hold lung MRI scan with AI-powered compressed sensing for nodule detection in comparison to photon counting detector-CT.European radiology · 2026Article
- Pulmonary nodules: classification, biomarkers, signaling pathways, diseases, early diagnosis and management.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Routine intraoperative frozen section assessment of lymph nodes in clinical stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: towards a risk-stratified approach.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Organ-specific patterns and prognostic impact of lung cancer recurrence after complete resection.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
- Health Insurance Type and Lung Cancer Stage Shift Following Coverage of Screening.Health services research · 2026Article
- Association of symptoms at diagnosis with prognosis in patients with surgically treated stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis of a prospectively maintained registry.Translational lung cancer research · 2026Article
- Association of Health Literacy With Survival in Patients With Lung Cancer.CHEST pulmonary · 2026Article
- Stage shifts in national lung adenocarcinoma and the impact of opportunistic self-initiated LDCT screening in Taiwan: a nationwide population-based cohort study.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
- The landscape of lung cancer screening globally: a comparison of established programs and estimates of eligibility to participate.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Review
- Article
- A preliminary study of a machine-learning prediction model for lung cancer diagnosis based on routine blood indicators and traditional chinese medicine diagnostic parameters.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Risk and Outcomes of Secondary Cancer Among Lung Cancer Survivors After Definitive Treatment.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- A New Era, New Risks: The Cardio-Oncology Perspective on Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
- Differences in lung cancer screening outcomes and follow-up by patient, provider and place-based characteristics in Missouri and Illinois: A cross-sectional study.Research square · 2025Article
- Review
- Lung lesion detectability on images obtained from decimated and CNN-based denoised [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the effect of the introduction of low dose computed tomography screening in 2013 on lung cancer stage shift, survival, and disparities in the stage of lung cancer diagnosed in the United States.
designQuasi-experimental study using Joinpoint modeling, multivariable ordinal logistic regression, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling.
settingUS National Cancer Database and Surveillance Epidemiology End Results program database.
participantsPatients aged 45-80 years diagnosed as having non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2018.
main outcome measuresAnnual per cent change in percentage of stage I NSCLC diagnosed among patients aged 45-54 (ineligible for screening) and 55-80 (potentially eligible for screening), median all cause survival, and incidence of NSCLC; multivariable adjusted odds ratios for year-to-year changes in likelihood of having earlier stages of disease at diagnosis and multivariable adjusted hazard ratios for changes in hazard of death before versus after introduction of screening.
resultsThe percentage of stage I NSCLC diagnosed among patients aged 55-80 did not significantly increase from 2010 to 2013 (from 27.8% to 29.4%) and then increased at 3.9% (95% confidence interval 3.0% to 4.8%) per year from 2014 to 2018 (from 30.2% to 35.5%). In multivariable adjusted analysis, the increase in the odds per year of a patient having one lung cancer stage lower at diagnosis during the time period from 2014 to 2018 was 6.2% (multivariable adjusted odds ratio 1.062, 95% confidence interval 1.048 to 1.077; P<0.001) higher than the increase in the odds per year from 2010 to 2013. Similarly, the median all cause survival of patients aged 55-80 did not significantly increase from 2010 to 2013 (from 15.8 to 18.1 months), and then increased at 11.9% (8.9% to 15.0%) per year from 2014 to 2018 (from 19.7 to 28.2 months). In multivariable adjusted analysis, the hazard of death decreased significantly faster after 2014 compared with before 2014 (P<0.001). By 2018, stage I NSCLC was the predominant diagnosis among non-Hispanic white people and people living in the highest income or best educated regions. Non-white people and those living in lower income or less educated regions remained more likely to have stage IV disease at diagnosis. Increases in the detection of early stage disease in the US from 2014 to 2018 led to an estimated 10 100 averted deaths.
conclusionsA recent stage shift toward stage I NSCLC coincides with improved survival and the introduction of lung cancer screening. Non-white patients and those living in areas of greater deprivation had lower rates of stage I disease identified, highlighting the need for efforts to increase access to screening in the US.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.