Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35354550›Full record

ArticleEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2022

Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Dominick J Angiolillo, Mattia Galli, Jean-Philippe Collet, Adnan Kastrati, Michelle L O'Donoghue

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
41.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 267 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Personalized Antithrombotic Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review of Risk-Stratified Approaches.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. One-Year Outcomes of Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Eluting Stents: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Impact of Mild Hypothermia As Adjunctive Therapy in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Site-Specific Antithrombotic Therapy: 24-Month Outcomes of the Randomized DESyne BDS Plus Trial Using a Novel Triple-Drug Eluting Coronary Implant With Two Anticoagulants and Sirolimus.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2025
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Impact of evolocumab on the pharmacodynamic profiles of clopidogrel in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Trial
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Frequencies ofBiomedicines · 2026
    Article
  20. Review

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Dominick J AngiolilloDivision of Cardiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Mattia GalliDivision of Cardiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Jean-Philippe ColletACTION Study Group, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.
Adnan KastratiDeutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Michelle L O'DonoghueTIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USDeutsches Herzzentrum München · DESorbonne Université · FRUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antiplatelet therapy is key to reducing local thrombotic complications and systemic ischaemic events among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), but it is inevitably associated with increased bleeding. The continuous refinement in stent technologies, together with the high incidence of ischaemic recurrences after PCI and the understanding of prognostic implications associated with bleeding, have led to a substantial evolution in antiplatelet treatment regimens over the past decades. Numerous investigations have been conducted to better stratify patients undergoing PCI according to their ischaemic and bleeding risks and to implement antithrombotic regimens accordingly. Evidence from these investigations have resulted in a number of antithrombotic treatment options as recommended by recent guidelines. In this State-of-the-Art review we provide the rationale, summarise the evidence, and discuss current and future directions of antiplatelet treatment regimens after PCI.

Indexed as

Percutaneous Coronary InterventionThrombosisHemorrhageHumansPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsStentsPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID35354550
PMCPMC9896394
OpenAlexW4225526112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.