Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35354470›Full record

ArticleBiomedical engineering online2022

Machine learning classification of multiple sclerosis patients based on raw data from an instrumented walkway.

Wenting Hu, Owen Combden, Xianta Jiang, Syamala Buragadda, Caitlin J Newell, Maria C Williams, Amber L Critch, Michelle Ploughman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wenting HuDepartment of Computer Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland, Canada.
Owen CombdenDepartment of Computer Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland, Canada.
Xianta JiangDepartment of Computer Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland, Canada. xiantaj@mun.ca.
Syamala BuragaddaFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland, Canada.
Caitlin J NewellFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland, Canada.
Maria C WilliamsFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland, Canada.
Amber L CritchFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland, Canada.
Michelle PloughmanFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland, Canada.
Memorial University of Newfoundland · CA

Funding

Canada Foundation for Innovation 33621Canada Research Chairs Program 950-230457Canadian Institutes for Health Research 169649Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery RGPIN-2020-05525
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsing embedded sensors, instrumented walkways provide clinicians with important information regarding gait disturbances. However, because raw data are summarized into standard gait variables, there may be some salient features and patterns that are ignored. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory neurodegenerative disease which predominantly impacts young to middle-aged adults. People with MS may experience varying degrees of gait impairments, making it a reasonable model to test contemporary machine leaning algorithms. In this study, we employ machine learning techniques applied to raw walkway data to discern MS patients from healthy controls. We achieve this goal by constructing a range of new features which supplement standard parameters to improve machine learning model performance.

resultsEleven variables from the standard gait feature set achieved the highest accuracy of 81%, precision of 95%, recall of 81%, and F1-score of 87%, using support vector machine (SVM). The inclusion of the novel features (toe direction, hull area, base of support area, foot length, foot width and foot area) increased classification accuracy by 7%, recall by 9%, and F1-score by 6%.

conclusionsThe use of an instrumented walkway can generate rich data that is generally unseen by clinicians and researchers. Machine learning applied to standard gait variables can discern MS patients from healthy controls with excellent accuracy. Noteworthy, classifications are made stronger by including novel gait features (toe direction, hull area, base of support area, foot length and foot area).

Indexed as

Multiple SclerosisNeurodegenerative DiseasesAdultGaitHumansMachine LearningMiddle AgedSupport Vector MachineArtificial intelligenceGait analysisMachine learningMultiple sclerosisRehabilitationWalkway

Identifiers

PMID35354470
PMCPMC8969278
OpenAlexW4221136859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.