Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35354445›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Integration of a menstrual health intervention in a community-based sexual and reproductive health service for young people in Zimbabwe: a qualitative acceptability study.

Mandikudza Tembo, Jenny Renju, Helen A Weiss, Ethel Dauya, Nancy Gweshe, Precious Ndlovu, Portia Nzombe, Chido Dziva Chikwari, Constancia Vimbayi Mavodza, Constance R S Mackworth-Young and 2 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03719521 (Community Based Interventions to Improve HIV Outcomes in Youth), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03719521 nacompletednot on this map

Community Based Interventions to Improve HIV Outcomes in Youth: a Cluster Randomised Trial in Zimbabwe (CHIEDZA)

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineRan2019 to 2022Enrolled36,991ConditionsHIV InfectionArmsCommunity-based package of integrated HIV, SRH and general health services
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mandikudza TemboMRC International Statistics & Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. mandikudza.tembo@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4520-3317
Jenny RenjuMRC International Statistics & Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Helen A WeissMRC International Statistics & Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Ethel DauyaBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Nancy GwesheBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Precious NdlovuBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Portia NzombeBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Chido Dziva ChikwariBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Constancia Vimbayi MavodzaBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Constance R S Mackworth-YoungBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Rashida A FerrandBiomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Suzanna C FrancisMRC International Statistics & Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBBiomedical Research and Training Institute · ZW

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R010161/1Wellcome Trust 206316/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite being fundamental to the health and well-being of women, menstrual health is often overlooked as a health priority and access to menstrual health education, products, and support is limited. Consequently, many young women are unprepared for menarche and face challenges in accessing menstrual health products and support and in managing menstruation in a healthy and dignified way. In this paper, we examine the acceptability of a comprehensive menstrual health and hygiene (MHH) intervention integrated within a community-based sexual and reproductive health (SRH) service for young people aged 16-24 years in Zimbabwe called CHIEDZA.

methodsWe conducted focus group discussions, that included participatory drawings, with CHIEDZA healthcare service providers (N = 3) and with young women who had attended CHIEDZA (N = 6) between June to August 2020. Translated transcripts were read for familiarisation and thematic analysis was used to explore acceptability. We applied Sekhon's thematic framework of acceptability that looks at seven key constructs (affective attitudes, burden, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, perceived effectiveness, and self-efficacy). Data from FGDs and meeting minutes taken during the study time period were used to triangulate a comprehensive understanding of MHH intervention acceptability.

resultsThe MHH intervention was acceptable to participants as it addressed the severe prevailing lack of access to menstrual health education, products, and support in the communities, and facilitated access to other SRH services on site. In addition to the constructs defined by Sekhon's thematic framework, acceptability was also informed by external contextual factors such as sociocultural norms and the economic environment. Providers highlighted the increased burden in their workload due to demand for MHH products, and how sociocultural beliefs around insertable menstrual products compromising virginity can negatively affect acceptability among young people and community members.

conclusionsMHH interventions are acceptable to young women in community-based settings in Zimbabwe as there is great unmet need for comprehensive MHH support. The integration of MHH in SRH services can serve as a facilitator to female engagement with SRH services. However, it is important to note that contextual external factors can affect the implementation and acceptability of integrated SRH and MHH services within communities.

trial registrationRegistry: Clinicaltrials.gov, Registration Number: NCT03719521 , Registration Date: October 25, 2018.

Indexed as

MenstruationReproductive Health ServicesAdolescentAdultCommunity Health ServicesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansYoung AdultZimbabweAcceptabilityCommunity-based interventionsMenstrual healthService deliveryService integrationYouth

Identifiers

PMID35354445
PMCPMC8966602
OpenAlexW4220662106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.