Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35354438›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2022

"What do you mean I can't have a doctor? this is Canada!" - a qualitative study of the myriad consequences for unattached patients awaiting primary care attachment.

Emily Gard Marshall, Sara Wuite, Beverley Lawson, Melissa K Andrew, Lynn Edwards, Adrian MacKenzie, Ana Correa Woodrow, Sarah Peddle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. An ounce of "superscreener": A novel cancer screening program targeting unattached individuals.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Impact of changes in primary care attachment: a scoping review.Family medicine and community health · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Popularity of HIV self-tests may say more about the state of our primary care system than about the device itself.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Toward a universal definition of provider-patient attachment in primary care.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emily Gard MarshallDepartment of Family Medicine, Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, 1465 Brenton St., Suite 402, Halifax, NS, B3J 3T4, Canada. Emily.Marshall@dal.ca.
Sara WuitePublic Health, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Canada.
Beverley LawsonDepartment of Family Medicine, Primary Care Research Unit, Dalhousie University, 1465 Brenton St., Suite 402, Halifax, NS, B3J 3T4, Canada.
Melissa K AndrewDepartment of Medicine (Geriatrics), Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Lynn EdwardsPrimary Health Care & Chronic Disease Management, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Canada.
Adrian MacKenzieResearch and Innovation, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Canada.
Ana Correa WoodrowPatient Partner, Halifax, Canada.
Sarah PeddlePatient Partner, Halifax, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient access to primary healthcare (PHC) is the foundation of a strong healthcare system and healthy populations. Attachment to a regular PHC provider, a key to healthcare access, has seen a decline in some jurisdictions. This study explored the consequences of unattachment from a patient perspective, an under-studied phenomenon to date.

methodsA realist-informed qualitative study was conducted with unattached patients in Nova Scotia, Canada. Semi-structured interviews with nine participants were conducted and transcribed for analysis. The framework method was used to carry out analysis, which was guided by Donabedian's model of assessing healthcare access and quality.

resultsFive key findings were noted in this study: 1) Participants experienced a range of consequences from not having a regular PHC provider. Participants used creative strategies to 2) attempt to gain attachment to a regular PHC provider, and, to 3) address their health needs in the absence of a regular PHC provider. 4) Participants experienced negative feelings about themselves and the healthcare system, and 5) stress related to the consequences and added work of being unattached and lost care.

conclusionsUnattached patients experienced a burden of care related to lost care and managing their own health and related information, due to the download of medical record management and system navigation to them. These findings may underestimate the consequences for further at-risk populations who would not have been included in our recruitment. This may result in poorer health outcomes, which could be mitigated by interventions at the structural level, such as enhanced centralized waitlists to promote attachment. Such waitlists may benefit from a triage approach to appropriately attach patients based on need.

Indexed as

PhysiciansPrimary Health CareHealth Services AccessibilityHumansNova ScotiaQualitative ResearchAccessContinuity of patient careFamily practicePrimary carePrimary health careWaiting lists

Identifiers

PMID35354438
PMCPMC8966849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.