Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35354419›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being2022

Influence at work is a key factor for mental health - but what do contemporary employees in knowledge and relational work mean by "influence at work"?

Malene Friis Andersen, Peter Aske Svendsen, Karina Nielsen, Svend Brinkmann, Reiner Rugulies, Ida Elisabeth Huitfeldt Madsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The meaning of decision latitude in registered nurses' night work.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Malene Friis AndersenDepartment of Psychosocial Work Environment, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Peter Aske SvendsenDepartment of Psychosocial Work Environment, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Karina NielsenDepartment of Management School, Sheffield University, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9685-9570
Svend BrinkmannDepartment of Communication and Psychology, University of Aalborg, Denmark.
Reiner RuguliesDepartment of Psychosocial Work Environment, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ida Elisabeth Huitfeldt MadsenDepartment of Psychosocial Work Environment, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
National Research Centre for the Working Environment · DKAalborg University · DKUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCommon mental health problems are a substantial burden in many western countries. Studies have pointed out that work related factors can both increase and decrease the risk of developing mental health problems. Influence at work is a key factor relating the psychosocial work environment to employees mental health. However, little is known regarding how contemporary employees experience and understand influence at work. The purpose of this study is to explore this in depth.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 59 employees in knowledge and relational work and analysed the data using principles from Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA).

findingsTWe identified three themes each consisting of two interrelated parts, where the second part describes the consequences of the identified type of influence for employees: 1) work tasks and performance, 2) relations and belonging, 3) identity and becoming.

conclusionsThe interviewed employees had a multifaceted understanding of influence at work and that influence at work mattered to them in different but important ways. Our hope is that managers, employees and consultants will be inspired by the three themes when designing work tasks, organizations and interventions in order to increase the level of influence and thereby help enhance the mental well-being of employees.

Indexed as

Mental HealthOccupational HealthHumansWorkplaceInfluencejob-strainorganizationstresswell-beingwork

Identifiers

PMID35354419
PMCPMC8979504
OpenAlexW4220886551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.